- Open Access
Mechanisms of vascularization in murine models of primary and metastatic tumor growth
- Edina Bugyik†1, 2, 3,
- Ferenc Renyi-Vamos†2,
- Vanessza Szabo1,
- Katalin Dezso1,
- Nora Ecker1,
- Andras Rokusz1,
- Peter Nagy1,
- Balazs Dome2, 4, 5 and
- Sandor Paku1, 6Email author
© Bugyik et al. 2016
- Received: 7 October 2015
- Accepted: 6 January 2016
- Published: 12 February 2016
Directed capillary ingrowth has long been considered synonymous with tumor vascularization. However, the vasculature of primary tumors and metastases is not necessarily formed by endothelial cell sprouting; instead, malignant tumors can acquire blood vessels via alternative vascularization mechanisms, such as intussusceptive microvascular growth, vessel co-option, and glomeruloid angiogenesis. Importantly, in response to anti-angiogenic therapies, malignant tumors can switch from one vascularization mechanism to another. In this article, we briefly review the biological features of these mechanisms and discuss on their significance in medical oncology.
- Primary tumor
Angiogenesis refers to the proliferation of vascular cells (endothelial cells and pericytes) and the increase of vessel density. It has a pivotal role in the nutrition of tumors. In the 1970s, Folkman et al.  found that, without angiogenesis, solid tumors cannot grow beyond the limits of diffusion (1 mm3). Above this size, the so-called angiogenic switch occurs; currently, anti-angiogenic therapies are based on this assumption. In this article, we review and compare our data on the vascularization mechanisms of primary and metastatic tumors with the findings of other groups. We also discuss the potential reasons for failure of anti-angiogenic therapies [2, 3].
Angiogenic processes during vascularization of tumors
The two basic forms of angiogenesis are endothelial sprouting  and intussusceptive angiogenesis . Both processes require connective tissue and participate in the formation of the tumor vasculature. Many primary tumors (e.g., melanoma, colon cancer, and breast cancer) are surrounded by provisional connective tissue that develops because of the vascular permeability-enhancing effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This connective tissue contains fibronectin/fibrin and collagen, which enables the continuous development of new capillaries by sprouting or intussusceptive angiogenesis .
Two models of sprouting angiogenesis have been described. According to the first model, interendothelial contacts of the venules closest to the tumors become weakened . This phenomenon is caused by angiogenic factors released by tumor cells. After local degradation of basement membrane, non-polarized endothelial cells migrate into the connective tissue. This is followed by the formation of the lumen, synthesis of the new basement membrane, and the appearance of pericytes around the newly formed capillaries. The disadvantage of this model is the inability to identify the stimulus required for lumen formation.
The second model suggests that interendothelial contacts remain intact, and after the degradation of the basement membrane, polarized endothelial cells migrate into the connective tissue . During this process, parallel migration of polarized endothelial cells enables the prompt formation of a split-like lumen that is continuous with the lumen of the mother vessel. The basement membrane is continuously deposited by the endothelial cells. Only the very tip of the growing capillary bud is free of basement membrane and is in connection with the connective tissue collagen. Migrating along the basement membrane deposited by the endothelial cells, proliferating pericytes of the mother vessel appear later around the immature capillaries.
Intussusceptive angiogenesis (i.e., “vessel division”) is another mode to increase vessel density. This process enhances the complexity and density of the vessel network, thus providing additional surface for further vessel sprouting . Intussusceptive angiogenesis increases vessel density faster than sprouting angiogenesis and plays a pivotal role in the formation of the developing lung vasculature . There are two different modes of intussusceptive angiogenesis. According to the first model, endothelial cells of the opposite vessel walls establish contact because of the pressure generated by connective tissue cells or pericytes; this is followed by the reorganization of intercellular junctions leading to the perforation of the endothelial bilayer. Collagen-producing cells enter the perforation in the vessel lumen. These cells and the synthesized collagen build up the connective tissue pillar in the lumen of the vessel (1–5 µm in diameter), which is a characteristic of intussusceptive angiogenesis. Further growth of the pillar results in the complete division of the lumen .
The formation of intraluminal pillars may also occur by another mechanism, the first step of which is the formation of endothelial bridges in the lumen. Here, degradation of the basement membrane takes place, and bridging endothelial cells attach to connective tissue collagen bundles and transport them through the lumen. The collagen bundles are covered by endothelial cells; thus, initially, the nascent pillars are built up by two endothelial cells and a single collagen bundle. Fibroblasts migrate into this pillar and synthesize additional connective tissue, which results in pillar maturation . Of note, similar to sprouting angiogenesis (model two; see above), the polarity of endothelial cells does not change in either case. Accordingly, this type of pillar formation can be called inverse sprouting since the connective tissue (surrounded by the endothelium) is located in the vessel lumen. In contrast, during sprouting angiogenesis, the lumen is located in the connective tissue.
Numerous schematic depictions in various studies suggested that, during vascularization, the nearby vessels grow into the tumor [1, 9, 10]. However, in 1987, Thompson et al.  found that mouse tumors grow by incorporating the host tissue microvasculature. A subsequent human study by Pezzella et al.  in 1997 confirmed the phenomenon of vessel incorporation in “non-angiogenic” primary non-small cell lung cancers. Subsequently, our research group proved in experimental and human melanomas that vessels that develop by sprouting angiogenesis in the connective tissue surrounding the tumors become incorporated. Because of the growth of the tumor, the vessel density of the incorporated vascular network decreases (becomes diluted) . This phenomenon occurs because of the lack of branching activity of the intratumoral vessels. The low proliferation of endothelial cells solely supports the dilatation of the tumoral vessels . An insufficient amount of collagen-containing connective tissue within the tumors results in the termination of sprouting angiogenesis. In both human and experimental melanomas, the capillary network is arranged in parallel with the surface of the tumor. This phenomenon itself supports the notion that melanomas do not acquire their vasculature by vessel ingrowth .
Vascularization of metastases
In clinical oncology, treatment of metastases is a great challenge. Angiogenesis is a possible target for the treatment of tumors. Since the most frequent sites for metastasis formation (the brain, liver, and lung) contain dense capillary networks and a relatively small amount of connective tissue, it is likely that vascularization of metastases develops differently from primary tumors.
Glomeruloid bodies (GBs) are characteristics mainly of primary brain tumors, but they appear in brain metastases and in other tumors as well . GBs acquired their name because of their superficial resemblance to renal glomeruli. Until recently, the mechanism of GB formation was largely unknown. Stiver et al.  performed a detailed analysis of GBs that were developed in a tumor-free environment using a VEGF-coding vector injected into brain tissue. The first step in the process was the appearance of dilated mother vessels. In the vessel wall, pericytes and endothelial cells started to proliferate and formed numerous lumens within the lumen of the mother vessel. Next, these structures differentiated into distinct daughter vessels through apoptosis of endothelial cells. Our group described another much simpler process in brain micrometastases . According to this model, after injection of tumor cells into the carotid artery, tumor cells extravasate and adhere to the external surface of the basement membrane of capillaries. Following this, even a single cell is able to produce simple loops on capillaries (Fig. 1b), presumably because of the forces exerted by the actin cytoskeleton of tumor cells attached tightly to the surface of the basement membrane. Later, the force exerted by the proliferating and migrating tumor cells results in the appearance of more complex GBs as tumor cells pull new vessel segments into the tumor nests (Fig. 1c). This process leads to the thinning and eventual rupturing of capillary segments located between tumor nests. Proliferation of endothelial cells is only slightly elevated during this process; therefore, the increase of the vessel density is simply the consequence of the remodeling of the existing vasculature in the brain tissue.
Vermeulen et al.  described liver metastases with different growth patterns. The first type is the so-called “replacement” growth pattern where the liver structure is preserved and the liver trabeculae are replaced by tumor cells. In the second important growth pattern (“pushing”), the liver structure is distorted, liver cells on the surface of metastases are compressed, and connective tissue is deposited around the tumor. Replacement growth is a characteristic of undifferentiated metastases, whereas pushing growth is a characteristic of differentiated metastases.
We examined experimental liver metastases that were produced by the injection of Lewis lung carcinoma cells into the spleen of C57Bl/6 mice. In this model, tumor cells reached the liver via the portal vein and formed colonies. Our studies on anaplastic Lewis lung carcinoma liver metastases showed that tumor cells migrated in the space of Disse during the invasion, at the tumor periphery, thereby detaching the endothelial cells from their basement membrane (structured basement membrane could not be observed in the sinusoids, but immunoelectron microscopic observations revealed several basement membrane elements between the microvilli of hepatocytes) . Endothelial cells that get into the tumors start to proliferate and form functional vessels with wide lumen and vulnerable, convoluted walls (sinusoidal type metastases) . We also observed another type of Lewis lung carcinoma metastasis that was located in portal spaces or in their close vicinity (portal-type metastases). These metastases are characterized by numerous small vessels that stained positively for basement membrane components. These vessels presumably evolved during sprouting angiogenesis within the connective tissue of portal spaces. Notably, the ratio of portal-type metastases was higher when tumor cells reached the liver via the arterial system. However, tumor cells entering the liver from the direction of the portal system produced more sinusoidal metastases. These results suggest that a proportion of the tumor cells delivered via the arterial route are more likely to be trapped in the capillaries of the peribiliary plexus .
Finally, it is noteworthy that in neither sinusoidal (replacement) nor pushing-type metastases does angiogenesis take place in the peritumoral liver parenchyma.
Cells of undifferentiated tumors enter into the alveolar walls, and during their invasion/migration they detach pneumocytes from the surface of capillaries (Fig. 3c). As a result, tumor cells co-opt the capillaries that were formerly responsible for the gas exchange. Incorporated capillaries remain functional and provide blood supply for the tumor. Interestingly, tumor cells detach pneumocytes from the capillaries together with their basement membrane; thus, tumor cells actually migrate between the endothelial and epithelial basement membranes (Fig. 3d). Of note, the presence of basement membrane is not sufficient to support the survival of pneumocytes, which vanish by fragmentation within the tumor tissue.
Polarized tumor cells of well-differentiated C38 colon tumor do not migrate back into the alveolar walls from the alveolar space; instead, they induce a desmoplastic reaction in the alveolar wall. During this reaction, the fibroblasts present in the alveolar wall are transformed into smooth muscle actin (SMA)-expressing and connective tissue collagen-synthesizing myofibroblasts. Alveolar walls being incorporated into the tumor gradually widen, resulting in the development of connective tissue columns (centrally located microvessels embedded in connective tissue collagen and SMA-expressing activated fibroblasts surrounded by a basement membrane). The structure of these columns corresponds completely to the structure of connective tissue columns in the liver metastases of this same tumor (Fig. 2b). The accumulated connective tissue within the metastases and the significantly elevated proliferation index of intratumoral endothelial cells may indicate the initiation of angiogenesis within the columns.
Blood supply of metastases
We conclude that the incorporation of both the preexisting host vasculature (which can be modified by the tumor) and the newly formed vessels plays an important role in the vascularization of tumors. The incorporation process is basically biomechanical in nature. We think that anti-angiogenic therapies should be given mainly to patients with primary tumors in which endothelial proliferation is present. The perimetastatic region cannot be targeted by anti-angiogenic therapies because angiogenesis does not occur in the adjacent host tissues of tumor metastases (possibly because of the lack of sufficient connective tissue). However, when sufficient connective tissue is synthesized in the more central part of the lesions in a later phase of metastasis development, intratumoral angiogenesis is possible. This requires the presence of connective tissue cells in the target organ that are able to transform into collagen-synthesizing myofibroblasts.
SP is the corresponding author. SP, EB, FRV, and BD wrote the manuscript. SP, PN, FRV, and BD participated in study design and coordinated and supervised the study. EB, VSZ, KD, NE, and AR collected the samples, carried out the experiments, and interpreted the data. All authors made important contributions to the conception and design of the study and reviewed the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The study was supported by the Grants from KTIA AIK 12-1-2013-0041; Semmelweis University Start-Up Grant 40148-11658; OTKA K109626, OTKA SNN114490, OTKA K100931, OTKA PD109201, EUREKA_HU_12-1-2012-0057; TÁMOP 4.2.4.A/1-11-1-2012-0001; ÖNB Jubiläumsfondsprojekt Nr. 14043 and Nr. 14574, and the Vienna Fund for Innovative Interdisciplinary Cancer Research.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Folkman J, Cotran R. Relation of vascular proliferation to tumor growth. Int Rev Exp Pathol. 1976;16:207–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sennino B, McDonald DM. Controlling escape from angiogenesis inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(10):699–709. doi:10.1038/nrc3366.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vasudev NS, Reynolds AR. Anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer: current progress, unresolved questions and future directions. Angiogenesis. 2014;17(3):471–94. doi:10.1007/s10456-014-9420-y.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burri PH, Hlushchuk R, Djonov V. Intussusceptive angiogenesis: its emergence, its characteristics, and its significance. Dev Dyn. 2004;231(3):474–88. doi:10.1002/dvdy.20184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dvorak HF. Rous-Whipple Award Lecture. How tumors make bad blood vessels and stroma. Am J Pathol. 2003;162(6):1747–57.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis. Adv Cancer Res. 1985;43:175–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paku S, Paweletz N. First steps of tumor-related angiogenesis. Lab Invest. 1991;65(3):334–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paku S, Dezso K, Bugyik E, Tovari J, Timar J, Nagy P, et al. A new mechanism for pillar formation during tumor-induced intussusceptive angiogenesis: inverse sprouting. Am J Pathol. 2011;179(3):1573–85. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.033.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gordon MS, Mendelson DS, Kato G. Tumor angiogenesis and novel antiangiogenic strategies. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(8):1777–87. doi:10.1002/ijc.25026.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stoeltzing O, Liu W, Reinmuth N, Parikh A, Ahmad SA, Jung YD, et al. Angiogenesis and antiangiogenic therapy of colon cancer liver metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(7):722–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thompson WD, Shiach KJ, Fraser RA, McIntosh LC, Simpson JG. Tumours acquire their vasculature by vessel incorporation, not vessel ingrowth. J Pathol. 1987;151(4):323–32. doi:10.1002/path.1711510413.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pezzella F, Pastorino U, Tagliabue E, Andreola S, Sozzi G, Gasparini G, et al. Non-small-cell lung carcinoma tumor growth without morphological evidence of neo-angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 1997;151(5):1417–23.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dome B, Paku S, Somlai B, Timar J. Vascularization of cutaneous melanoma involves vessel co-option and has clinical significance. J Pathol. 2002;197(3):355–62. doi:10.1002/path.1124.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jain RK, di Tomaso E, Duda DG, Loeffler JS, Sorensen AG, Batchelor TT. Angiogenesis in brain tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;8(8):610–22. doi:10.1038/nrn2175.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leenders WP, Kusters B, Verrijp K, Maass C, Wesseling P, Heerschap A, et al. Antiangiogenic therapy of cerebral melanoma metastases results in sustained tumor progression via vessel co-option. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(18 Pt 1):6222–30. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0823.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bugyik E, Dezso K, Reiniger L, Laszlo V, Tovari J, Timar J, et al. Lack of angiogenesis in experimental brain metastases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70(11):979–91. doi:10.1097/NEN.0b013e318233afd7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Straume O, Chappuis PO, Salvesen HB, Halvorsen OJ, Haukaas SA, Goffin JR, et al. Prognostic importance of glomeruloid microvascular proliferation indicates an aggressive angiogenic phenotype in human cancers. Cancer Res. 2002;62(23):6808–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stiver SI, Tan X, Brown LF, Hedley-Whyte ET, Dvorak HF. VEGF-A angiogenesis induces a stable neovasculature in adult murine brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2004;63(8):841–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dome B, Timar J, Paku S. A novel concept of glomeruloid body formation in experimental cerebral metastases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;62(6):655–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vermeulen PB, Colpaert C, Salgado R, Royers R, Hellemans H, Van Den Heuvel E, et al. Liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinomas grow in three patterns with different angiogenesis and desmoplasia. J Pathol. 2001;195(3):336–42. doi:10.1002/path.966.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paku S, Lapis K. Morphological aspects of angiogenesis in experimental liver metastases. Am J Pathol. 1993;143(3):926–36.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paku S, Kopper L, Nagy P. Development of the vasculature in “pushing-type” liver metastases of an experimental colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2005;115(6):893–902. doi:10.1002/ijc.20886.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szabo V, Bugyik E, Dezso K, Ecker N, Nagy P, Timar J, et al. Mechanism of tumour vascularization in experimental lung metastases. J Pathol. 2015;235(3):384–96. doi:10.1002/path.4464.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pezzella F, Di Bacco A, Andreola S, Nicholson AG, Pastorino U, Harris AL. Angiogenesis in primary lung cancer and lung secondaries. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A(14):2494–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin G, Lunderquist A, Hagerstrand I, Boijsen E. Postmortem examination of the blood supply and vascular pattern of small liver metastases in man. Surgery. 1984;96(3):517–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haugeberg G, Strohmeyer T, Lierse W, Bocker W. The vascularization of liver metastases. Histological investigation of gelatine-injected liver specimens with special regard to the vascularization of micrometastases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1988;114(4):415–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuruppu D, Christophi C, O’Brien PE. Microvascular architecture of hepatic metastases in a mouse model. HPB Surg. 1997;10(3):149–57; (discussion 58).PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dezso K, Bugyik E, Papp V, Laszlo V, Dome B, Tovari J, et al. Development of arterial blood supply in experimental liver metastases. Am J Pathol. 2009;175(2):835–43. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2009.090095.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar