- Original article
- Open Access
Prognostic significance of the pre-chemotherapy lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy
- Gui-Nan Lin†1,
- Pan-Pan Liu†2,
- Dong-Ying Liu†3,
- Jie-Wen Peng1,
- Jian-Jun Xiao1 and
- Zhong-Jun Xia4Email author
- Received: 12 July 2015
- Accepted: 18 November 2015
- Published: 6 January 2016
Abstract
Background
As a surrogate marker of systemic inflammation, the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) is an independent prognostic factor for various malignancies. This study investigated the prognostic significance of the pre-chemotherapy LMR in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving chemotherapy.
Methods
The present study included newly diagnosed mCRC patients treated between January 2005 and December 2013 with FOLFOX chemotherapy, specifically oxaliplatin 180 mg/m2 on day 1, with leucovorin 400 mg/m2 administered as a 2-hour infusion before the administration of 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus injection, and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 as a 46-h infusion immediately after 5-fluorouracil bolus injection. The LMR was calculated as the absolute count of lymphocytes divided by the absolute count of monocytes. COX proportional hazards analysis was performed to evaluate the association of LMR with survival outcomes.
Results
A total of 488 patients were included. Patients with high pre-chemotherapy LMR experienced significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS, 9.2 vs. 7.6 months, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, 19.4 vs. 16.6 months, P < 0.001) compared with patients with low pre-chemotherapy LMR. Subsequent COX multivariate analysis showed that high pre-chemotherapy LMR (≥3.11) was an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS and OS. Additionally, patients whose LMR remained high (high–high subgroup), increased (low–high subgroup), or decreased (high–low subgroup) following chemotherapy showed better results in terms of PFS and OS than patients whose LMR remained low (low–low subgroup) after chemotherapy.
Conclusions
For patients with previously untreated mCRC receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy, an elevated pre-chemotherapy LMR is an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS and OS, and changes in the LMR before and after chemotherapy seem to predict the benefit of chemotherapy.
Keywords
- Metastatic colorectal cancer
- Inflammation
- Lymphocyte
- Monocyte
- Prognosis
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer among men and women in the most developed areas in China, and its incidence is increasing significantly because of the aging population [1, 2]. Metastatic disease is found in approximately half of all patients [3]. Combined treatment with oxaliplatin (OHP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) that is biochemically activated by leucovorin (LV), also known as FOLFOX regimen, remains the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, with an objective response rate of 31% and a median survival of approximately 14 months [4, 5]. Due to unsatisfactory results obtained by palliative chemotherapy, identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers that can be used to improve disease management through patient classification remains the subject of intense investigation in mCRC.
Inflammation is a key component of the tumor microenvironment [6]. Accumulating evidence has shed light on the molecular pathways that link inflammation and cancer, suggesting that inflammation in the tumor microenvironment leads to neoplastic cell proliferation, angiogenesis, metastasis, collapse of antitumor immunity, and unresponsiveness to antineoplastic therapy [7–9]. Therefore, cancer-related inflammation represents a potential therapeutic target for treating cancer [10]. Lymphocytes can turn into tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) by migrating into the tumor microenvironment. Stage III CRC patients with a high level of TILs experience better results in terms of 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than patients with a low level of TILs [11]. Monocytes can differentiate into macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. In turn, macrophages promote tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis [12]. As a surrogate marker of systemic inflammation, the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) serves as an independent prognostic factor for a large variety of malignancies [13–16]. A study including 372 patients with stages II and III colon cancer revealed that patients with preoperative LMR > 2.83 obtained significant improvements in terms of time-to-recurrence and OS compared with patients with LMR ≤ 2.83, and the benefit of adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy was limited to patients with preoperative LMR > 2.83 [17].
To the best of our knowledge, the prognostic significance of circulating LMR in patients with previously untreated mCRC receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy is not well defined. Therefore, this study investigated the prognostic significance of pre-chemotherapy LMR in patients with newly diagnosed mCRC receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy.
Patients and methods
Ethical statement
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to treatment.
Patient selection
Between January 2005 and December 2013, patients treated at the Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were retrospectively identified to determine their eligibility for the study. The eligibility criteria were as follows: age ≥18 and ≤75 years, pathologically proven and chemotherapy-naïve mCRC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2, first-line chemotherapy with FOLFOX (OHP 180 mg/m2 on day 1 with LV 400 mg/m2 administered as a 2-h infusion before 5-FU 400 mg/m2 administered as an intravenous bolus injection, and 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 as a 46-h infusion immediately after 5-FU bolus injection), chemotherapy duration ≥6 and ≤12 cycles, and complete clinical and follow-up data. Patients were excluded if they had any active infections prior to the first chemotherapy cycle.
Measurement of LMR
Peripheral blood was obtained within 3 days before the initiation of the first cycle of chemotherapy and between 3 and 4 weeks after the completion of the last cycle. A complete blood count with differential quantification was generated using the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XE-2100 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). The LMR was calculated by dividing the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) by the absolute monocyte count (AMC).
Statistical analysis
Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of chemotherapy initiation to the date of first progression, death from any cause, or the last follow-up. OS was calculated from the time of diagnosis to the date of death from any cause. The optimal cutoff levels were determined by receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. A Chi-square test was used to compare baseline features between different groups. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses to determine prognostic predictors were performed using COX proportional hazard regression models. These analyses were performed with SPSS software (version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Patient characteristics
A total of 488 patients were eligible for the study. The median age at diagnosis was 54 years (range 37–72 years). The ratio of males to females was approximately 1.2:1. An ECOG performance status of less than 2 was observed in 314 patients (64.3%). Primary colon cancer was diagnosed in 259 patients (53.1%). The tumor was well or moderately differentiated in 283 patients (58.0%). The median number of metastatic sites was 2 (range 1–5). The median chemotherapy cycles were 9 (range 6–12). The median pre-chemotherapy lymphocyte and monocyte counts were 2.83 × 109/L (range 0.31–5.64 × 109/L) and 0.65 × 109/L (range 0.16–4.19 × 109/L), respectively. All patients were followed up until December 31, 2014. The median follow-up time was 23.5 months (range 4.3–32.8 months).
Selection of cut-off values
Based on ROC curves for survival analysis, the optimal cut-off values were 2.70 × 109/L for ALC, with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.634 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.546–0.724, P = 0.034]; 0.55 × 109/L for AMC, with an AUC value of 0.712 (95% CI 0.613–0.795, P = 0.008); and 3.11 for LMR, with an AUC value of 0.733 (95% CI 0.638–0.786, P = 0.004).
Comparison of patient characteristics based on the cut-off values
Comparison of baseline clinical characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer stratified by pre-treatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR)
Characteristic | LMR < 3.11 [cases (%)] | LMR ≥ 3.11 [cases (%)] | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 216 | 272 | |
Gender | 0.817 | ||
Male | 119 (55.1) | 147 (54.0) | |
Female | 97 (44.9) | 125 (46.0) | |
Age (years) | 0.802 | ||
<60 | 139 (64.4) | 178 (65.4) | |
≥60 | 77 (35.6) | 94 (34.6) | |
ECOG performance status | 0.013 | ||
<2 | 126 (58.3) | 188 (69.1) | |
≥2 | 90 (41.7) | 84 (30.9) | |
Site of primary tumor | 0.907 | ||
Colon | 114 (52.8) | 145 (53.3) | |
Rectum | 102 (47.2) | 127 (46.7) | |
No. of metastatic sites | <0.001 | ||
≤2 | 157 (72.7) | 118 (43.4) | |
>2 | 59 (27.3) | 154 (56.6) | |
Tumor differentiation | <0.001 | ||
Well or moderate | 163 (75.5) | 120 (44.1) | |
Poor | 53 (24.5) | 152 (55.9) | |
Pre-chemotherapy ALC (×109/L) | |||
<2.70 | 122 (56.5) | 107 (39.3) | |
≥2.70 | 94 (43.5) | 165 (60.7) | |
Pre-chemotherapy AMC (×109/L) | <0.001 | ||
<0.55 | 57 (26.4) | 128 (47.1) | |
≥0.55 | 159 (73.6) | 144 (52.9) |
Survival outcomes
Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free and overall survival of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer stratified by pre-treatment ALC (a, b), AMC (c, d), and LMR (e, f). ALC absolute lymphocyte count, AMC absolute monocyte count, LMR lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio
Univariate and multivariate analysis of pre-chemotherapy LMR as a prognostic factor for PFS
Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables associated with progression-free survival of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer
Characteristic | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
Gender | 0.931 | |||
Male | 1 (reference) | 0.870 | 1 (reference) | |
Female | 0.984 (0.815–1.189) | 0.992 (0.819–1.200) | ||
Age (years) | 0.837 | |||
<65 | 1 (reference) | 0.931 | 1 (reference) | |
≥65 | 0.991 (0.714–1.207) | 0.837 (0.668–1.408) | ||
ECOG performance status | <0.001 | |||
<2 | 1 (reference) | 0.009 | 1 (reference) | |
≥2 | 1.300 (1.066–1.585) | 1.515 (1.206–1.907) | ||
Site of primary tumor | 0.560 | |||
Colon | 1 (reference) | 0.542 | 1 (reference) | |
Rectum | 1.060 (0.878–1.280) | 1.058 (0.876–1.278) | ||
No. of metastatic sites | 0.049 | |||
≤2 | 1 (reference) | 0.001 | 1 (reference) | |
>2 | 1.388 (1.148–1.680) | 1.229 (1.001–1.509) | ||
Tumor differentiation | 0.005 | |||
Well or moderate | 1 (reference) | <0.001 | 1 (reference) | |
Poor | 1.617 (1.334–1.961) | 1.354 (1.095–1.675) | ||
Pre-chemotherapy ALC (× 109/L) | 0.059 | |||
<2.70 | 1 (reference) | 0.072 | 1 (reference) | |
≥2.70 | 0.841 (0.697–1.015) | 0.792 (0.621–1.009) | ||
Pre-chemotherapy AMC (× 109/L) | 0.001 | |||
<0.55 | 1 (reference) | 0.001 | 1 (reference) | |
≥0.55 | 1.409 (1.159–1.713) | 1.513 (1.172–1.954) | ||
Pre-chemotherapy LMR | 0.005 | |||
<3.11 | 1 (reference) | <0.001 | 1 (reference) | |
≥3.11 | 0.552 (0.454–0.671) | 0.710 (0.558–0.903) |
Univariate and multivariate analyses of pre-chemotherapy LMR as a prognostic factor for OS
Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables associated with overall survival of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer
Characteristic | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
Gender | 0.055 | 0.07 | ||
Male | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
Female | 0.804 (0.644–1.004) | 0.812 (0.648-1.017) | ||
Age (years) | 0.567 | 0.199 | ||
<65 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
≥65 | 1.070 (0.849–1.347) | 0.842 (0.647–1.095) | ||
ECOG performance status | 0.005 | <0.001 | ||
<2 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
≥2 | 1.388 (1.103–1.747) | 1.620 (1.244–2.111) | ||
Site of primary tumor | 0.974 | 0.938 | ||
Colon | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
Rectum | 1.004 (0.806–1.250) | 1.009 (0.809–1.257) | ||
No. of metastatic sites | 0.002 | 0.065 | ||
≤2 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
>2 | 1.417 (1.135–1.769) | 1.252 (0.986–1.589) | ||
Tumor differentiation | <0.001 | 0.002 | ||
Well or moderate | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
Poor | 1.736 (1.385–2.176) | 1.484 (1.159–1.901) | ||
Pre-chemotherapy ALC (×109/L) | 0.121 | 0.391 | ||
<2.70 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
≥2.70 | 0.841 (0.676–1.047) | 0.884 (0.668–1.171) | ||
Pre-chemotherapy AMC (×109/L) | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
<0.55 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
≥0.55 | 1.514 (1.204–1.903) | 1.703 (1263–2.296) | ||
Pre-chemotherapy LMR | <0.001 | 0.004 | ||
<3.11 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
≥3.11 | 0.568 (0.453–0.712) | 0.662 (0.501–0.875) |
Changes in LMR and benefits of chemotherapy
Changes in LMR and benefits of chemotherapy
Pre- and post-chemotherapy LMR | No. of patients | Progression-free survival (months) | Overall survival (months) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | P value | Median (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | P value* | ||
Low–low | 87 | 5.8 (5.1–6.5) | 1 | 13.0 (10.3–15.7) | 1 | ||
Low–high | 129 | 8.4 (7.7–9.1) | 0.524 (0.391–0.702) | <0.001 | 17.8 (16.9–18.7) | 0.522 (0.371–0.771) | <0.001 |
High–low | 151 | 8.2 (7.8–8.6) | 0.733 (0.636–0.846) | <0.001 | 17.0 (15.6–18.4) | 0.837 (0.699–1.003) | 0.053 |
High–high | 121 | 10.6 (9.8–11.4) | 0.631 (0.566–0.702) | <0.001 | 22.2 (21.0–23.4) | 0.636 (0.562–0.719) | <0.001 |
Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free and overall survival of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer according to the changes in LMR before and after chemotherapy. a progression-free survival, b overall survival
Discussion
In the present study, patients with high pre-chemotherapy LMR experienced significant improvements in PFS (9.2 vs. 7.6 months, P < 0.001) and OS (19.4 vs. 16.6 months, P < 0.001) compared with patients with low pre-chemotherapy LMR. Subsequent COX multivariate analysis showed that high pre-chemotherapy LMR (≥3.11) was an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS and OS. Additionally, patients whose LMR remained high (high–high subgroup), increased (low–high subgroup), or decreased (high–low subgroup) following chemotherapy showed better results in terms of PFS and OS than patients whose LMR remained low (low–low subgroup) after chemotherapy, suggesting that the change in LMR before and after chemotherapy may predict the benefit of chemotherapy.
Approximately half of all CRC patients develop distant metastasis [3], which poses a huge clinical challenge. In clinical practice, the FOLFOX regimen is the treatment of choice for patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRC and has favorable toxicity profiles compared with the irinotecan-based combination regimen [4, 5]. However, a significant difference in the response to chemotherapeutic agents has been noted among mCRC patients, suggesting that mCRC is a heterogeneous disease. Hence, considerable strides have been made in seeking prognostic or predictive biomarkers to classify heterogeneous mCRC. Inflammation is profoundly involved in promoting pathogenesis and progression of tumor [6]. Nowacki et al. [18] revealed that a prolonged duration of ulcerative colitis dramatically increased the risk of CRC (P < 0.001), whereas the risk could be markedly reduced by anti-inflammatory treatment (P < 0.02), suggesting that inflammation may have a profound influence on the pathogenesis of CRC. Lymphocytes play an important role in constraining the proliferation of malignant cells. As a surrogate marker of weak immunity, peripheral blood lymphopenia is associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) [14]. TILs are observed in the tumor microenvironment and reflect an adaptive immune response [6]. The superior survival outcomes associated with high concentrations of TILs in CRC has been well documented [19–21]. Furthermore, growing evidence suggests that CD8+ cells and other activated T lymphocytes might suppress metastasis rather than tumor growth [22]. Monocytes can differentiate into macrophages in the tumor microenvironment [6]. Experimental evidence has shown remarkable interactions between tumor cells, macrophages, and blood vessels, facilitating angiogenesis and promoting tumor cell motility, which eventually results in distant metastases [23, 24]. In addition, a survival advantage associated with low levels of peripheral blood monocytes has been observed in NPC patients [14]. Taking the above considerations into account, peripheral blood LMR, which is an indicator of systemic inflammation, becomes an ideal candidate due to the advantage of simplicity, accessibility, and inexpensiveness compared with complex molecular markers.
A large cohort study including 1547 non-metastatic NPC patients showed that higher LMR levels (≥5.22) were significantly associated with longer DFS and OS (P < 0.001) [14]. Subsequent multivariate COX proportional hazard analysis confirmed that higher LMR levels remained a significant independent factor for longer DFS (HR = 0.669, 95% CI 0.535–0.838, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.558, 95% CI 0.417–0.748, P < 0.001) [14]. Lin et al. [16] found that newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients with increased LMR (≥4.56) obtained longer PFS (5.60 vs. 5.04 months, P = 0.001) and OS (13.20 vs. 11.72 months, P < 0.001) than those with decreased LMR. Moreover, LMR was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 0.660, 95% CI 0.512–0.851, P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.530, 95% CI 0.409––0.687, P < 0.001) [16]. For patients with stage II and III colon cancer, patients with high preoperative LMR (>2.83) showed better results in terms of time-to-recurrence (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.29–0.76, P = 0.002) and OS (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.31–0.83, P = 0.007) than those with low preoperative LMR [17]. Similar to these aforementioned reports, our study cohort demonstrated that chemotherapy-naïve mCRC patients with high pre-chemotherapy LMR (≥3.11) showed significant improvements in PFS (9.2 vs. 7.6 months, P < 0.001) and OS (19.4 vs. 16.6 months, P < 0.001) compared with patients with low pre-chemotherapy LMR. Furthermore, our subsequent COX multivariate analysis showed that high pre-chemotherapy LMR was an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 0.710, 95% CI 0.558–0.903; P = 0.005) and OS (HR = 0.662, 95% CI 0.501–0.875, P = 0.004). Taking the above considerations into account, pre-treatment LMR seems to be an independent prognostic factor that can classify cancer patients into different prognostic subgroups, improving the personalized management of cancer.
In addition to pre-treatment LMR, the prognostic significance of changes in LMR before and after treatment should also be explored. In our study cohort, the optimal cut-off values of the pre- and post-chemotherapy LMR were both set at 3.11. Subsequently, all patients were divided into four subgroups based on the cut-off values of pre- and post-treatment LMRs. As expected, the low–low subgroup had the worst survival results, whereas the high–high subgroup had the best survival results. Additionally, patients whose LMR increased (low–high subgroup) or decreased (high–low subgroup) after chemotherapy showed longer PFS and OS than patients whose LMR remained low (low–low subgroup) after chemotherapy. A recent study evaluated the prognostic impact of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in 199 non-smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving gefitinib or standard chemotherapy as first-line therapy [25]. In the high pre-treatment NLR group, patients whose NLR decreased after treatment had a longer OS than those whose NLR remained high following treatment (20.7 vs. 7.9 months, P < 0.001). Similarly, in the low pre-treatment NLR group, patients whose NLR remained low after treatment had a longer OS than those whose NLR increased after treatment (26.4 vs. 18.9 months, P < 0.001) [25]. Therefore, a change in LMR before and after chemotherapy seemed to predict the benefit of chemotherapy in chemotherapy-naïve mCRC patients receiving the FOLFOX regimen.
The strengths of this study are the large sample size and the relatively low heterogeneity of patients who were all diagnosed with chemotherapy-naïve mCRC and treated with FOLFOX chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the major limitation of this study is its retrospective design, which contributes to selection bias. Prospective studies are necessary to validate our results. Additionally, inflammatory factors such as lymphocytes and monocytes may be influenced by many potential confounding factors, such as latent infection and autoimmune disease. Hence, potential confounding factors must be excluded while considering LMR as a prognostic factor for cancer patients.
In conclusion, for patients with previously untreated mCRC receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy, a high pre-chemotherapy LMR is an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS and OS, and changes in LMR before and after chemotherapy seem to predict the benefit of chemotherapy.
Notes
Declarations
Author’s contributions
Study conception and design: GNL, DYL, JWP, JJX, ZJX. Administrative support: ZJX. Provision of study materials or patients: GNL, DYL, JWP, JJX, ZJX. Collection and assembly of data: GNL, DYL. Data analysis and interpretation: GNL, PPL, DYL, ZJX. Manuscript writing: GNL, PPL, ZJX. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the patients and their families and all investigators, including the physicians, nurses, and laboratory technicians in this study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Li XP, Cao GW, Sun Q, Yang C, Yan B, Zhang MY, et al. Cancer incidence and patient survival rates among the residents in the Pudong New Area of Shanghai between 2002 and 2006. Chin J Cancer. 2013;32:512–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhou Q, Li K, Lin GZ, Shen JC, Dong H, Gu YT, et al. Incidence trends and age distribution of colorectal cancer by subsite in Guangzhou, 2000-2011. Chin J Cancer. 2015;34:34.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tournigand C, André T, Achille E, Lledo G, Flesh M, Mery-Mignard D, et al. FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:229–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Colucci G, Gebbia V, Paoletti G, Giuliani F, Caruso M, Gebbia N, et al. Phase III randomized trial of FOLFIRI versus FOLFOX4 in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter study of the Gruppo Oncologico Dell’Italia Meridionale. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4866–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1073–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454:436–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karin M. Nuclear factor-kappaB in cancer development and progression. Nature. 2006;441:431–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu H, Kortylewski M, Pardoll D. Crosstalk between cancer and immune cells: role of STAT3 in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:41–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harrison ML, Obermueller E, Maisey NR, Hoare S, Edmonds K, Li NF, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha as a new target for renal cell carcinoma: two sequential phase II trials of infliximab at standard and high dose. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4542–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huh JW, Lee JH, Kim HR. Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for patients with colorectal cancer. Arch Surg. 2012;147:366–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Condeelis J, Pollard JW. Macrophages: obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cell. 2006;124:263–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li ZM, Huang JJ, Xia Y, Sun J, Huang Y, Wang Y, et al. Blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio identifies high-risk patients in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41658.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li J, Jiang R, Liu WS, Liu Q, Xu M, Feng QS, et al. A large cohort study reveals the association of elevated peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio with favorable prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e83069.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiang R, Cai XY, Yang ZH, Yan Y, Zou X, Guo L, et al. Elevated peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio predicts a favorable prognosis in the patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Cancer. 2015;34:23.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin GN, Peng JW, Xiao JJ, Liu DY, Xia ZJ. Prognostic impact of circulating monocytes and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio on previously untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based doublet. Med Oncol. 2014;31:70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stotz M, Pichler M, Absenger G, Szkandera J, Arminger F, Schaberl-Moser R, et al. The preoperative lymphocyte to monocyte ratio predicts clinical outcome in patients with stage III colon cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:435–40.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nowacki TM, Brückner M, Eveslage M, Tepasse P, Pott F, Thoennissen NH, et al. The risk of colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:492–501.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Naito Y, Saito K, Shiiba K, Ohuchi A, Saigenji K, Nagura H, et al. CD8 + T cells infiltrated within cancer cell nests as a prognostic factor in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998;58:3491–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guidoboni M, Gafà R, Viel A, Doglioni C, Russo A, Santini A, et al. Microsatellite instability and high content of activated cytotoxic lymphocytes identify colon cancer patients with a favorable prognosis. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:297–304.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prall F, Dührkop T, Weirich V, Ostwald C, Lenz P, Nizze H, et al. Prognostic role of CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in stage III colorectal cancer with and without microsatellite instability. Hum Pathol. 2004;35:808–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, Lagorce-Pagès C, et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science. 2006;313:1960–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin EY, Gouon-Evans V, Nguyen AV, Pollard JW. The macrophage growth factor, CSF-1, in mammary gland development and tumor progression. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2002;7:147–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin EY, Li JF, Gnatovskiy L, Deng Y, Zhu L, Grzesik DA, Qian H, et al. Macrophages regulate the angiogenic switch in a mouse model of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:11238–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee Y, Kim SH, Han JY, Kim HT, Yun T, Lee JS. Early neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio reduction as a surrogate marker of prognosis in never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving gefitinib or standard chemotherapy as first-line therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138:2009–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar