- Case report
- Open Access
Relapse of both small cell lung cancer and Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome after a 13-year disease-free survival period
© The Author(s) 2016
- Received: 19 November 2015
- Accepted: 10 March 2016
- Published: 2 July 2016
Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) is a paraneoplastic syndrome and only 3% of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) patients have LEMS. Moreover, the recurrence of SCLC after a disease-free survival (DFS) of more than 10 years is rare. We report a patient who had a recurrence of both SCLC and LEMS after a 13-year DFS period. A 69-year-old man was diagnosed with LEMS and SCLC (cT0N2M0, stage IIIA) 13 years ago. Chemoradiotherapy was performed and a complete response was achieved. With anticancer treatment, the LEMS symptoms was alleviated. At the age of 82 years, gait disturbance appeared followed by left supraclavicular lymphadenopathy and further examination revealed the recurrence of SCLC. Careful screening for the recurrence of SCLC might be needed when the patient has recurrent or secondary paraneoplastic neurological syndrome even after a long DFS period.
- Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome
- Paraneoplastic syndrome
- Paraneoplastic neurological syndrome
- P/Q-type anti-voltage-gated calcium channel antibody
- Small cell lung carcinoma
Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) is a paraneoplastic syndrome and only 3% of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) patients have LEMS . In addition, SCLC recurrence after a disease-free survival (DFS) of more than 10 years is rare [2–4]. Herein, we report a patient with a recurrence of both SCLC and LEMS after a 13-year DFS period. Our case might indicate the importance of SCLC recurrence screening in patients with a recurrence or a secondary paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (PNS) even after a long DFS period.
Carboplatin (area under the curve: 5 mg/mL, day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m2, days 1–3) were intravenously administered every 4 weeks (total eight cycles) and radiotherapy of the mediastinum with a total dose of 45 Gy (1.5 Gy/fraction, twice daily) was delivered. A complete response was achieved. The serum level of P/Q-type VGCC antibody had remarkably decreased to 958 pmol/L after the first three chemotherapy cycles; after all eight cycles, it decreased from 1608 to 40 pmol/L. Gait disturbance and dysarthria were alleviated. SCLC had not recurred for 13 years.
When lung cancer is diagnosed after a long DFS period, it is difficult to decide whether it is due to a recurrence or a secondary primary lung cancer. A 5-year DFS is an indicator of the cure of SCLC . However, in some cases of SCLC, a recurrence after a DFS period of more than 10 years has been reported [2–4]. We considered the present case as a recurrence of SCLC for a few reasons. First, the immunological staining pattern of specimens obtained in 2015 was similar to that in 2001, although synaptophysin expression was not observed in 2015. Second, recurrence is more common than a second primary SCLC in SCLC patients with a long survival period. In 60 patients with SCLC who survived for more than 5 years, nine had SCLC recurrence and none had a second primary SCLC . Johnson et al.  studied 62 SCLC patients with a DFS period of more than 2 years and reported that 18 had recurrence whereas two had a second primary SCLC. Third, considering the doubling time, a recurrence after a DFS period of more than 13 years is quite possible . Moreover, in our case, SCLC reappeared on the same side of the mediastinal lymph nodes. Therefore, we considered this case as a recurrence of SCLC. A small amount of SCLC cells had grown for 13 years. However, there remains the possibility of recurrence.
In the study of secondary PNS by Ducray et al. , it was reported that, in all patients with a cancer recurrence, a secondary PNS antedated the cancer recurrence. In our case, gait disturbance was presented before the diagnosis of an SCLC recurrence. If the patient has a recurrence or a secondary PNS, careful screening for cancer recurrence is needed.
The etiology of PNS recurrence might be mediated by onconeural antibody production stimulated by the recurrence of SCLC. In this case, the serum level of P/Q-type VGCC antibody was elevated with the recurrence of SCLC and LEMS. A previous study reported that, among the patients with PNS positive for onconeural antibody, the same antibody was detected when a secondary PNS appeared . Nagashima et al.  reported an SCLC patient with anti-Hu antibody who experienced a recurrence of SCLC with a secondary PNS. However, in contrast to our cases, those patients had a secondary PNS different from the first one [8, 9]. Anti-Hu antibody is related to some types of PNS, such as sensory neuropathy, cerebellar ataxia and limbic encephalitis . On the other hand, P/Q-type VGCC antibody was relatively specific to LEMS. The antibody was detected in 85–90% of patients with LEMS  and 10 of 12 SCLC patients with the P/Q-type VGCC antibody had LEMS . This might be owing to the difference between our case and the cases reported in literature. It is unclear how the type of PNS was determined, although the same antibody was detected. Further study is needed to understand the etiology of PNS.
Recurrence of both SCLC and LEMS after a DFS period of more than 10 years is rare. However, careful screening for cancer recurrence is needed if the patient has a recurrence or a secondary PNS.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and any accompanying image.
FA was the attending medical student and drafted the manuscript. KW was the attending physician during admission and drafted the manuscript. KM was the attending physician at outpatient clinic and made the diagnosis. MT made the pathological diagnosis and helped the draft. YT, IH, MS and TS performed the examinations and helped the draft. MS, MK and TK reviewed and helped the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Gozzard P, Woodhall M, Chapman C, Nibber A, Waters P, Vincent A, et al. Paraneoplastic neurologic disorders in small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective study. Neurology. 2015;85:235–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Ajam M, Seymour A, Mooty M, Leaf A. Ten years of disease-free survival between two diagnoses of small-cell lung cancer: a case report and a literature review. Med Oncol. 2005;22:89–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kitamoto Y, Hayakawa K, Mitsuhashi N, Tsuchiya S, Saito R. Redevelopment of small cell lung cancer after a long disease-free period: a case report. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2002;32:30–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsui K, Sawa T, Suzuki H, Nakagawa K, Okamoto N, Tada T, et al. Relapse of stage I small cell lung cancer ten or more years after the start of treatment. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006;36:457–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewinski T, Zulawski M. Small cell lung cancer survival: 3 years as a minimum for predicting a favorable outcome. Lung Cancer. 2003;40:203–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lassen U, Osterlind K, Hansen M, Dombernowsky P, Bergman B, Hansen HH. Long-term survival in small-cell lung cancer: posttreatment characteristics in patients surviving 5 to 18+ years—an analysis of 1,714 consecutive patients. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:1215–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson BE, Linnoila RI, Williams JP, Venzon DJ, Okunieff P, Anderson GB, et al. Risk of second aerodigestive cancers increases in patients who survive free of small-cell lung cancer for more than 2 years. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:101–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ducray F, Graus F, Vigliani MC, Antoine JC, Rogemond V, Saiz A, et al. Delayed onset of a second paraneoplastic neurological syndrome in eight patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:937–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagashima T, Mizutani Y, Kawahara H, Maguchi S, Terayama Y, Shinohara T, et al. Anti-Hu paraneoplastic syndrome presenting with brainstem-cerebellar symptoms and Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Neuropathology. 2003;23:230–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lucchinetti CF, Kimmel DW, Lennon VA. Paraneoplastic and oncologic profiles of patients seropositive for type 1 antineuronal nuclear autoantibodies. Neurology. 1998;50:652–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Titulaer MJ, Lang B, Verschuuren JJ. Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome: from clinical characteristics to therapeutic strategies. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:1098–107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar