- Open Access
Carcinogenic effects of circadian disruption: an epigenetic viewpoint
Chinese Journal of Cancer volume 34, Article number: 38 (2015)
Circadian rhythms refer to the endogenous rhythms that are generated to synchronize physiology and behavior with 24-h environmental cues. These rhythms are regulated by both external cues and molecular clock mechanisms in almost all cells. Disruption of circadian rhythms, which is called circadian disruption, affects many biological processes within the body and results in different long-term diseases, including cancer. Circadian regulatory pathways result in rhythmic epigenetic modifications and the formation of circadian epigenomes. Aberrant epigenetic modifications, such as hypermethylation, due to circadian disruption may be involved in the transformation of normal cells into cancer cells. Several studies have indicated an epigenetic basis for the carcinogenic effects of circadian disruption. In this review, I first discuss some of the circadian genes and regulatory proteins. Then, I summarize the current evidence related to the epigenetic modifications that result in circadian disruption. In addition, I explain the carcinogenic effects of circadian disruption and highlight its potential role in different human cancers using an epigenetic viewpoint. Finally, the importance of chronotherapy in cancer treatment is highlighted.
The circadian timing system consists of a master clock that is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus. There are also many subsidiary clocks that are located in other parts of the brain, peripheral tissues, and body cells [1, 2]. Circadian clocks refer to the circadian timing system, which generates and orchestrates circadian rhythms. Circadian rhythms, which occur in most living organisms, are endogenous rhythms that are generated to synchronize physiology and behavior with 24-h environmental cues [1, 3, 4]. Circadian rhythms are involved in many tissue-specific processes ranging from gene expression to behavior. In fact, circadian rhythms are regulated not only by external cues but also by molecular clock mechanisms within almost all cells . These molecular clocks are driven by interlocked transcriptional-translational feedback loops and integrated with various metabolic and environmental cues [4, 6].
Molecular circadian clocks govern the daily expression of thousands of tissue-specific genes . Disharmony between these circadian clocks and environmental cues is referred to as circadian disruption. The human lifestyle and the entrainment of circadian rhythms have changed radically during the last two centuries . In addition, the advent of electric lights and the movement from a traditional to a modern lifestyle have led to exposure to artificial light and other circadian misalignments . Circadian disruption leads to the occurrence of various long-term diseases, including cancer [1, 10, 11].
Several environmental factors, such as night-shift work, exposure to artificial light, irregular diet, and electromagnetic (EM) waves, which affect biological processes mostly by altering melatonin rhythms, result in circadian disruption . Because light is the most potent synchronizer of circadian rhythms to the external environment, night-shift work and exposure to artificial light are the strongest disruptive factors of circadian rhythms . The majority of shift workers in the industrialized world suffer from forced night-shift work and its harmful consequences . Möller-Levet et al. , through transcriptome analysis, revealed that insufficient sleep can lead to the up- or down-regulation of 711 genes. They also reported that insufficient sleep can reduce the number of genes with a circadian expression pattern. Furthermore, they reported that several circadian genes, such as the PER (Period) family genes, circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK) and cryptochrome circadian clock 2 (CRY2), can be affected by insufficient sleep .
Circadian genes and regulatory proteins
The circadian timing system includes two interconnected molecular loops that involve at least nine genes . In mammals, brain and muscle ARNT-like 1 (BMAL1) and CLOCK are the two master genes involved in the regulation of circadian gene expression and biological functions . In one of the loops (core loop), the two transcription factors BMAL1 and CLOCK form a complex that binds to specific regions of DNA called enhancer-boxes (E-boxes). A highly conserved intermolecular zinc finger is integrated into this complex for further stabilization. The CLOCK:BMAL1 complex binds to E-boxes of some of its target genes, such as CRY1, CRY2, PER1, and PER2, to increase their expression levels. In contrast, the protein products of these genes oppose the activity of the CLOCK:BMAL1 complex and consequently form a negative feedback loop that suppresses their own expression [2, 6]. In the other loop (secondary loop), BMAL1 also acts as a transcriptional regulator in collaboration with CLOCK. The CLOCK:BMAL1 complex binds to the promoter-localized E-boxes of two genes, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1 (NR1D1) and RAR-related orphan receptor A (RORA), and activates their transcription. The genes NR1D1 and RORA code for two nuclear receptors, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1 (REV-ERBα) and RORα, respectively. The proteins REV-ERBα and RORα function as transcription factors. These nuclear receptors have a shared DNA-binding element called RORE within the BMAL1 promoter, and they compete with each other to bind to RORE. REV-ERBα represses BMAL1 and CLOCK expression, whereas RORα activates the transcription of BMAL1. Hence, the cyclic production of these two nuclear receptors results in the cyclic expression of CLOCK and BMAL1 [16, 17] (Fig. 1).
Circadian epigenetic modifications
The clock machinery, a synchronized system of transcription and translation, is responsible for creating the circadian epigenome. The circadian epigenome refers to the epigenetic content of the genome that is formed through different circadian regulatory pathways. These regulatory pathways involve reversible changes in chromatin transitions and epigenetic content [3, 18]. Several components are involved in these regulatory pathways. For example, deacetylase silent information regulation 2 homolog 1 (SIRT1) is a key factor in circadian control that reflects environmental changes . The enzyme SIRT1 represses circadian gene expression and also rhythmically reduces histone H3 K9/K14 acetylation at related DNA promoters. In fact, SIRT1 is an NAD(+)-dependent deacetylase. The quantity of coenzyme NAD(+) follows circadian fluctuations, which results in the regulation of SIRT1 in a circadian manner . In addition, several circadian epigenetic modifiers function in a tissue-specific manner. For example, in the liver, a histone methyltransferase called mixed lineage leukemia 3 (MLL3) both directly and indirectly controls more than a hundred circadian “output” genes that are epigenetically targeted .
The clock machinery controls transcription throughout the genome and is a critical factor in the temporal programming of tissue physiology . Rhythmic recruitment of key factors that modify chromatin structure and transcriptional and translational processes leads to the circadian organization of the mammalian transcriptome. Archer et al.  analyzed the human blood transcriptome and found that the forced desynchronization of sleep reduced rhythmic transcripts from 6.4% to 1.0%. The reduced transcripts were those involving regulation of transcription and translation, especially transcription of core clock genes . Furthermore, Haus et al.  reported that DNA in human peripheral blood cells is methylated in a circadian manner.
Clock proteins are involved in the coordination of different processes, such as covalent modifications, nuclear import/export, and proteolytic degradation. Epigenetic modification is a significant factor required for the proper function of these proteins. In addition, epigenetic modifications such as histone methylation, acetylation, and phosphorylation regulate the circadian rhythm of the expression of the genes that encode these proteins. Chromatin remodeling has been previously reported as an important factor that regulates the expression of both key clock components and clock-controlled genes (CCGs). Several environmental factors affect chromatin remodeling. For instance, light pulses stimulate the rapid phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 in SCN . Azzi et al.  showed that temporarily exposing mice to light can strikingly alter the overall expression of circadian genes in SCN. They also revealed, by genome-wide methylation profiling, that such external changes affect the methylation pattern of promoter DNA in SCN. To further prove this issue, they showed that interference by a methyltransferase inhibitor in SCN can suppress these period and epigenetic changes. They also reported that prolonged re-entrainment to a 24-h period can reverse these epigenetic modifications, supporting the presence of flexibility in SCN to coordinate with external changes .
Clock proteins are also involved in several epigenetic modifications. For example, CLOCK has intrinsic histone acetyl transferase (HAT) activity, and BMAL1, as the partner of CLOCK, enhances its HAT function . Furthermore, CLOCK and BMAL1 both acetylate non-histone proteins and are involved in various metabolic pathways that affect the cell cycle . Due to the important roles of these proteins in the regulation of the cell cycle, down-regulation of them may lead to tumorigenesis and malignancy. For example, transcriptionally silencing BMAL1 by hypermethylating its promoter results in the reduced formation of CLOCK:BMAL1 complex and consequently promotes malignancy . Additionally, rhythmic binding of the CLOCK:BMAL1 complex to DNA results in rhythmic chromatin modification, which mediates the rhythmic binding of other nearby transcription factors . In contrast, the histone deacetylase SIRT1 associates with the CLOCK:BMAL1 complex and antagonistically deacetylates various non-histone proteins, including BMAL1. In addition, the formation of the CLOCK:BMAL1:SIRT1 complex results in the induction of a large amount of gene transcription, including many CCGs that contain an E-box within their promoter . Moreover, other epigenetic marks are also involved in circadian transcriptional/translational regulation. The activation mark histone H3, when trimethylated at lysine 4 (H3K4me3), has a circadian pattern at thousands of genomic loci . Together, the available literature indicates that many proteins are involved in the synchronization of circadian rhythms by exerting epigenetic modifications .
Circadian disruption and carcinogenesis
Circadian disruption has been implicated in the development of different human cancers (Table 1). Disruption of circadian rhythms leads to epigenetic modifications, which may alter cell proliferation and subsequently result in oncogenesis and cancer  (Fig. 2). For example, disruption of melatonin rhythms is related to carcinogenesis. Many of these circadian disruptions are due to dramatic changes resulting from industrialization and the development of societies and consequent changes in lifestyle over the past few hundred years . Epigenetic changes can be the result of several environmental factors, including repeated circadian disruption due to long-term shift work. Studies on shift workers have demonstrated changes in the DNA methylation of their genes . It has been reported that 15%–20% of workers have shift work schedules worldwide. In 2007, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reported that shift work may be a carcinogenic factor in humans . In addition, studies of breast cancer in women with shift work schedules have provided more evidence for the carcinogenic effects of circadian disruption .
The synchronization of circadian rhythms results not only from the regulation of core clock genes but also from the regulation of various clock-controlled genes, including several cell cycle genes . The clock machinery and cell cycle are controlled by similar mechanisms that include feedback loops. It has also been reported that the clock machinery has functional interactions with cell cycle regulators, so that changes in clock function result in uncontrolled cell cycle progression and cell proliferation . Furthermore, due to associations between the circadian clock and cell metabolism, circadian disruption results in abnormal cell metabolism. All of these abnormalities are important factors in the process of carcinogenesis and can result in multi-tumorigenesis [32, 33]. The association between the cell cycle and the circadian clock indicates that regulation of circadian rhythms can control the cell cycle; however, regulation of the cell cycle at various checkpoints can also influence biological rhythms .
Dysfunction of the clock machinery and cellular oscillators is involved in tumorigenesis. Disruption of the expression of clock genes has also been observed in cancer patients . For example, the core clock genes PER1 and PER2 are known tumor suppressor genes, and their knockdown results in the doubling of tumor number and cancer growth; in contrast, overexpression of these genes decreases tumor number and cancer growth . In addition, transcriptional silencing of the BMAL1 gene through hypermethylation of its promoter CpG island has been observed in hematologic malignancies . Disruption of circadian rhythms results in the up- or down-regulation of several genes and proteins, which when combined lead to carcinogenesis. Long interspersed element-1 (L1) is a protein complex that promotes genomic instability through DNA double-strand breaks and insertional mutagenesis. Up-regulation of L1 has been reported in many human malignancies. Melatonin receptor 1 acts as an inhibitor of L1 mobilization by down-regulating L1 mRNA and the open reading frame 1 (ORF1) protein. Hence, exposure to environmental light regulates the expression of L1 through the regulation of melatonin production. This association indicates that suppression of melatonin production due to forced exposure to light increases L1-induced genomic instability and consequently promotes carcinogenesis . Furthermore, it has been shown that some long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) directly and indirectly alter melatonin synthesis. It has also been shown that the abundance of these lncRNAs changes in a circadian manner. These findings altogether indicate that circadian disruption may also alter melatonin expression and consequently promote carcinogenesis by changing the abundance of certain lncRNAs .
Epigenetic modifications play an important role in increasing susceptibility to breast cancer. In addition, epigenetic aberrations resulting from disruption of environmental factors (e.g., day-night cycles) may promote the development of breast cancer . Clock genes are associated with various functions that are relevant to carcinogenesis. Variants of some circadian genes, such as neuronal PAS domain protein 2 (NPAS2), circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK), cryptochrome circadian clock 2 (CRY2), and timeless circadian clock (TIMELESS), have been reported to be associated with breast cancer risk . It has also been shown that exposure to light at night markedly increases the growth of human breast cancer xenografts in rats . Exposure to light at night also reduces melatonin levels and may consequently result in increased estrogen production and altered estrogen receptor function. These results together lead to increased breast cancer risk . Shanmugam et al.  reported the existence of hypermethylation on the promoters of PER1, PER2, CRY1, and BMAL1 in 37 of 53 breast cancer cell lines. This observation provides evidence for the underlying epigenetic mechanisms of clock gene deregulation and its carcinogenic effects .
The association between disruption of circadian rhythms and genes and some types of leukemia has been reported. It has been demonstrated that the expression levels of the human CRY1, CRY2, PER1, PER2, PER3, and BMAL1 genes were down-regulated in both the chronic phase and blast crisis in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) . In addition, methylation analysis showed that CpG islands of the human PER3 gene were methylated in all of the CML patients, indicating an epigenetic basis for clock gene deregulation [12, 43].
Rana et al.  investigated the expression of four circadian clock genes (PER1, PER2, BMAL1, and CLOCK) and three clock-controlled cell cycle genes (Wee1, Cyclin D1, and Myc) in 37 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and an equal number of healthy controls. They also measured serum melatonin levels in peripheral blood to investigate circadian disruption. Their results revealed the down-regulation of PER1, PER2, BMAL1, and Wee1 genes and the up-regulation of Cyclin D1 and Myc genes in CLL patients, compared with healthy controls. They reported that the aberrant expression of circadian clock genes can result in the aberrant expression of downstream target genes that are associated with cell proliferation and apoptosis, which consequently may lead to CLL .
Ovarian cancer is known as the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide . In a study of a sample population of American women over 28 years, the association between circadian disruption and the risk of fatal ovarian cancer was investigated . In this study, three types of circadian disruption including rotating work schedule, monthly frequency of insomnia, and nightly sleep duration were measured. During the follow-up time, 1,289 deaths occurred from ovarian cancer in the at-risk cohort. Finally, this study indicated that elevated risk of fatal ovarian cancer has an important association with a rotating work schedule, but it has no significant association with sleep duration or insomnia.
Development of ovarian cancer can be promoted by epigenetic modifications. Aberrant hypermethylation of the promoters of certain genes is an important hallmark of cancer cells. Yeh et al.  analyzed the CpG islands of genes in various ovarian cancer cell lines and demonstrated that BMAL1, a core clock gene, is methylated in a subset of ovarian cancer cell lines. Specifically, the promoter of BMAL1 is trimethylated on histone H3 at lysine 27 by enhancer of Zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) in ovarian cancer CP70 and MCP2 cells. The authors showed that treatment of these cells with GSK126, an inhibitor of EZH2, can restore BMAL1 expression. Furthermore, overexpression of BMAL1 inhibits cell growth, enhances chemosensitivity to cisplatin, and restores the rhythmic activity of c-MYC in ovarian cancer cells. Finally, they presented BMAL1 as a tumor suppressor gene that is epigenetically silenced in ovarian cancer cells .
Colorectal cancer (CRC)
Disruption by circadian environmental cues occurs due to several factors, such as rotating shift work, and is involved in tumorigenesis and known to be a carcinogenic factor. It has been reported that disruption of circadian rhythms in shift workers is associated with an increased incidence of colorectal neoplastic disease . Considering that the regulation of digestion occurs according to a circadian clock machinery, circadian disruptive factors such as dietary deficiencies may impair this regulation and influence carcinogen metabolism, thereby contributing to CRC . Zeng et al.  investigated the association between BMAL1 expression level and CRC cell proliferation using three CRC cell lines, HCT116, HT29, and THC8307. They reported that BMAL1 overexpression inhibited CRC cell proliferation and also increased CRC sensitivity to oxaliplatin in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, CRC patients with a high BMAL1 expression level had longer overall survival and progression-free survival compared with those who had a low BMAL1 expression level. Specifically, BMAL1 exerts its effects on the regulation of G2/M arrest by activating the ATM pathway .
Short sleep duration, insomnia, and shift work schedules are some of the factors that disrupt circadian rhythms. The Cancer Prevention Study–II group performed a prospective study on men who experienced these circadian disruptive factors . They reported that there was an association between short sleep duration and high risk of fatal prostate cancer only during the first 8 years of follow-up. This association suggests that short sleep duration can affect later clinical stages of prostate cancer. In another study on 2,102 men, Sigurdardottir et al.  investigated the association between sleep disruption and the risk of prostate cancer. In this study, 6.4% of men were diagnosed with prostate cancer during the follow-up time. They suggested that certain aspects of sleep disruption may increase the risk of prostate cancer .
Disruption of circadian rhythms in lung function has been observed in patients with obstructive lung disease. Environmental tobacco/cigarette smoke (CS) can also alter the expression of BMAL1 through Sirtuin1 (SIRT1) deacetylase . In a study that aimed at determining the association between circadian disruption and quality of life among patients with advanced lung cancer, Grutsch et al.  investigated this association in 84 patients and found that behavioral, hormonal, and/or light-based strategies may improve circadian organization and help advanced lung cancer patients to experience better feeling and function. Another study on the epigenetic basis of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) used microarray analysis to focus on tumor suppressor genes silenced by DNA methylation and histone deacetylation. In this study, PER1 was presented as a candidate tumor suppressor in lung cancer. It was also revealed that PER1 expression levels were significantly higher in normal lung samples compared with NSCLC patient samples and cell lines. In addition, forced PER1 expression in NSCLC cell lines resulted in marked reductions in growth and the loss of clonogenic survival. These results indicated that circadian disruption plays an important role in lung tumorigenesis . Furthermore, the association between impairment of BMAL1 expression and disruption of circadian rhythms in lung function suggests that circadian disruption may be involved in lung cancer through alterations of BMAL1 expression.
Gapstur et al.  investigated the expression of eight circadian clock genes including PER1, PER2, PER3, CRY1, CRY2, BMAL1, CLOCK, and CKIε in a study on cancerous and noncancerous tissues from 29 gastric cancer patients. They reported that PER2 was notably up-regulated in cancer tissues compared with noncancerous tissues. In addition, up-regulation of CRY1 expression was markedly associated with the advancement of clinical stages of gastric cancer. They suggested that disruption of circadian rhythms may be associated with the development of gastric cancer .
Chronotherapy and cancer treatment
New advances in chronobiology and the discovery of the clock genes that are responsible for the generation and coordination of biological rhythms have led to the development of chronotherapy . It has also been shown that regulation of circadian rhythms to achieve robust circadian function can optimize treatment effects in cancer patients. Robust circadian function can be achieved through programmed exercise, light exposure, meal timing, sleep scheduling, and administration of drug usage with optimal circadian timing .
Cancer chronotherapy is emerging as a novel therapeutic strategy that suggests the scheduled usage of anti-cancer drugs based on optimal timing and according to the circadian rhythms of anti-cancer action [52, 53]. Cancer chronotherapy suggests the optimal timing based on circadian changes in the tolerability and efficacy of anticancer medications [54, 55]. Li et al.  suggested that a mathematical determination of optimal timing through the analysis of the REV-ERBα and BMAL1 regulatory transcription loop could improve tolerability to chemotherapy. Positive effects of chronotherapy have been shown in gastrointestinal cancer patients who were treated by chronomodulated chemotherapy. In addition, the application of chronotherapy in the treatment of CRC resulted in 39%–50% 5-year survival . Considering the circadian modulation of sensitivity to many therapeutic cytotoxic targets, Davidson et al.  suggested that controlling meal times may increase the efficacy of cancer treatment. The authors also suggested that these optimal timings could be designed according to the coincident times of greatest tumor sensitivity and lowest sensitivity of host tissue to damage. Chronotherapy provides opportunities not only for optimizing cancer treatment but also for development of new anticancer or supportive agents .
The available literature indicates the importance of regular circadian rhythms for human health. However, disruption of circadian rhythms has been widely reported to put our health at risk. Circadian disruption due to irregular environmental cues, which are the results of industrialization and our modern lifestyle, leads to various chronic diseases, including cancer. These findings suggest that organizing our lifestyle according to environmental cues and daily biological rhythms can be a preventive factor that opposes cancer. Scheduling different therapeutic processes, such as drug usage and chemotherapy, according to circadian biological rhythms may also optimize the effects of cancer treatment. It is further suggested that because aberrant epigenetic modifications are an important hallmark of cancer cells, carcinogenic effects of circadian disruption may have an epigenetic basis. The epigenetic function of some circadian components/genes have yet to be investigated, but the identification of underlying epigenetic mechanisms of circadian disruption in different carcinomas is worth further efforts. Additionally, identification of these epigenetic mechanisms may open up a new avenue for the production of new pharmaceuticals that regulate circadian rhythms and prevent cancer development.
Stojkovic K, Wing SS, Cermakian N. A central role for ubiquitination within a circadian clock protein modification code. Front Mol Neurosci. 2014;7:69.
Demarque M, Schibler U. Shedding new light on circadian clocks. Elife. 2013;2:e00659.
Aguilar-Arnal L, Sassone-Corsi P. The circadian epigenome: how metabolism talks to chromatin remodeling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013;25(2):170–6.
Partch CL, Green CB, Takahashi JS. Molecular architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(2):90–9.
Birky TL, Bray MS. Understanding circadian gene function: animal models of tissue-specific circadian disruption. IUBMB Life. 2014;66(1):34–41.
Nangle SN, Rosensweig C, Koike N, Tei H, Takahashi JS, Green CB, et al. Molecular assembly of the period-cryptochrome circadian transcriptional repressor complex. Elife. 2014;3:e03674.
Valekunja UK, Edgar RS, Oklejewicz M, van der Horst GTJ, O’Neill JS, Tamanini F, et al. Histone methyltransferase MLL3 contributes to genome-scale circadian transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(4):1554–9.
Roenneberg T, Kantermann T, Juda M, Vetter C, Allebrandt KV. Light and the human circadian clock. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2013;217:311–31.
Fonken LK, Nelson RJ. The effects of light at night on circadian clocks and metabolism. Endocr Rev. 2014;35(4):648–70.
Arellanes-licea E, Caldelas I, Ita-pé DD, Dí M, Mé CD. The circadian timing system: a recent addition in the physiological mechanisms underlying pathological and aging processes. Aging Dis. 2014;5(3):1–13.
Reddy AB, Rey G. Metabolic and nontranscriptional circadian clocks: eukaryotes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2014;83:165–89.
Shanmugam V, Wafi A, Al-Taweel N, Büsselberg D. Disruption of circadian rhythm increases the risk of cancer, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. J Local Global Health Sci. 2013;2013:3. doi:10.5339/jlghs.2013.3.
Möller-Levet CS, Archer SN, Bucca G, Laing EE, Slak A, Kabiljo R, et al. Effects of insufficient sleep on circadian rhythmicity and expression amplitude of the human blood transcriptome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(12):E1132–41.
Mormont MC, Levi F. Cancer chronotherapy: principles, applications, and perspectives. Cancer. 2003;97(1):155–69.
Menet JS, Pescatore S, Rosbash M. CLOCK:BMAL1 is a pioneer-like transcription factor. Genes Dev. 2014;28(1):8–13.
Dickmeis T. Glucocorticoids and the circadian clock. J Endocrinol. 2009;200(1):3–22.
Solt LA, Kojetin DJ, Burris TP. The REV-ERBs and RORs: molecular links between circadian rhythms and lipid homeostasis. Future Med Chem. 2011;3(5):623–38.
Sassone-Corsi P. Common threads: epigenetics, metabolism and the clock. BMC Genom. 2014;15(Suppl 2):O9.
Orozco-Solis R, Sassone-Corsi P. Epigenetic control and the circadian clock: linking metabolism to neuronal responses. Neuroscience. 2014;264:76–87.
Bellet MM, Nakahata Y, Boudjelal M, Watts E, Mossakowska DE, Edwards KA, et al. Pharmacological modulation of circadian rhythms by synthetic activators of the deacetylase SIRT1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(9):3333–8.
Archer SN, Laing EE, Möller-Levet CS, van der Veen DR, Bucca G, Lazar AS, et al. Mistimed sleep disrupts circadian regulation of the human transcriptome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(6):E682–91.
Haus EL, Smolensky MH. Shift work and cancer risk: potential mechanistic roles of circadian disruption, light at night, and sleep deprivation. Sleep Med Rev. 2013;17(4):273–84.
Azzi A, Dallmann R, Casserly A, Rehrauer H, Patrignani A, Maier B, et al. Circadian behavior is light-reprogrammed by plastic DNA methylation. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(3):377–82.
Doi M, Hirayama J, Sassone-Corsi P. Circadian regulator CLOCK is a histone acetyltransferase. Cell. 2006;125:497–508.
Taniguchi H, Fernández AF, Setién F, Ropero S, Ballestar E, Villanueva A, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of the circadian clock gene BMAL1 in hematologic malignancies. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8447–54.
Hardeland R. Melatonin, noncoding RNAs, messenger RNA stability and epigenetics—evidence, hints, gaps and perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(10):18221–52.
Sieck GC, Haddad GG, Lucchesi P. Physiology’s impact: discovering life. Physiology. 2013;28(2):62–3.
Kubo T. Cancer and lifestyle-related diseases risk among shifts workers. Nihon Rinsho. 2013;71(12):2206–12 (in Japanese).
Gapstur SM, Diver WR, Stevens VL, Carter BD, Teras LR, Jacobs EJ. Work schedule, sleep duration, insomnia, and risk of fatal prostate cancer. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(3 Suppl 1):S26–33.
Rana S, Munawar M, Shahid A, Malik M, Ullah H, Fatima W, et al. Deregulated expression of circadian clock and clock-controlled cell cycle genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(1):95–103.
Soták M, Sumová A, Pácha J. Cross-talk between the circadian clock and the cell cycle in cancer. Ann Med. 2014;46:221–32.
Sahar S, Sassone-Corsi P. Metabolism and cancer: the circadian clock connection. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(12):886–96.
Li S, Ao X, Wu H. The role of circadian rhythm in breast cancer. Chin J Cancer Res. 2013;25(4):442–50.
Masri S, Cervantes M, Sassone-Corsi P. The circadian clock and cell cycle: interconnected biological circuits. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013;25(6):730–4.
Mazzoccoli G, Vinciguerra M, Papa G, Piepoli A. Circadian clock circuitry in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(15):4197–207.
Hrushesky WJM, Grutsch J, Wood P, Yang X, Oh EY, Ansell C, et al. Circadian clock manipulation for cancer prevention and control and the relief of cancer symptoms. Integr Cancer Ther. 2009;8:387–97.
deHaro D, Kines KJ, Sokolowski M, Dauchy RT, Streva VA, Hill SM. Regulation of L1 expression and retrotransposition by melatonin and its receptor: implications for cancer risk associated with light exposure at night. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(12):7694–707.
Coon SL, Munson PJ, Cherukuri PF, Sugden D, Rath MF, Moller M, et al. Circadian changes in long noncoding RNAs in the pineal gland. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(33):13319–24.
Mathew S, Merdad A, Al-Maghrabi J, Dallol A. Identification of frequent MTNR1B methylation in breast cancer following the application of high-throughput methylome analysis. BMC Genom. 2014;15(Suppl 2):44.
Grundy A, Schuetz JM, Lai AS, Janoo-Gilani R, Leach S, Burstyn I, et al. Shift work, circadian gene variants and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37(5):606–12.
Stevens RG, Brainard GC, Blask DE, Lockley SW, Motta ME. Breast cancer and circadian disruption from electric lighting in the modern world. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(3):207–18.
Stevens RG. Circadian disruption and breast cancer: from melatonin to clock genes. Epidemiology. 2005;16:254–8.
Yang MY, Chang JG, Lin PM, Tang KP, Chen YH, Lin HYH, et al. Downregulation of circadian clock genes in chronic myeloid leukemia: alternative methylation pattern of hPER3. Cancer Sci. 2006;97:1298–307.
Yeh CM, Shay J, Zeng TC, Chou JL, Huang TH, Lai HC, et al. Epigenetic silencing of ARNTL, a circadian gene and potential tumor suppressor in ovarian cancer. Int J Oncol. 2014;45(5):2101–7.
Carter BD, Diver WR, Hildebrand JS, Patel AV, Gapstur SM. Circadian disruption and fatal ovarian cancer. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(3 Suppl 1):S34–41.
Derry MM, Raina K, Agarwal C, Agarwal R. Identifying molecular targets of lifestyle modifications in colon cancer prevention. Front Oncol. 2013;3:119.
Zeng ZL, Luo HY, Yang J, Wu WJ, Chen DL, Huang P, et al. Overexpression of the circadian clock gene Bmal1 increases sensitivity to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(4):1042–52.
Sigurdardottir LG, Valdimarsdottir UA, Mucci LA, Fall K, Rider JR, Schernhammer E, et al. Sleep disruption among older men and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22(5):872–9.
Hwang JW, Sundar IK, Yao H, Sellix MT, Rahman I. Circadian clock function is disrupted by environmental tobacco/cigarette smoke, leading to lung inflammation and injury via a SIRT1-BMAL1 pathway. FASEB J. 2014;28(1):176–94.
Grutsch JF, Ferrans C, Wood PA, Du-Quiton J, Quiton DFT, Reynolds JL, et al. The association of quality of life with potentially remediable disruptions of circadian sleep/activity rhythms in patients with advanced lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:193.
Gery S, Komatsu N, Kawamata N, Miller CW, Desmond J, Virk RK, et al. Epigenetic silencing of the candidate tumor suppressor gene Per1 in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1399–404.
Eriguchi M, Levi F, Hisa T, Yanagie H, Nonaka Y, Takeda Y. Chronotherapy for cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2003;57:92–5.
Innominato PF, Roche VP, Palesh OG, Ulusakarya A, Spiegel D, Lévi FA. The circadian timing system in clinical oncology. Ann Med. 2014;46(4):191–207.
Lévi F. Chronotherapeutics: the relevance of timing in cancer therapy. Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17(4):611–21.
Li XM, Mohammad-Djafari A, Dumitru M, Dulong S, Filipski E, Siffroi-Fernandez S, et al. A circadian clock transcription model for the personalization of cancer chronotherapy. Cancer Res. 2013;73(24):7176–88.
Davidson AJ, Straume M, Block GD, Menaker M. Daily timed meals dissociate circadian rhythms in hepatoma and healthy host liver. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(7):1623–7.
Lévi F. Circadian chronotherapy for human cancers. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2(5):307–15.
Yang MY, Yang WC, Lin PM, Hsu JF, Hsiao HH, Liu YC, et al. Altered expression of circadian clock genes in human chronic myeloid leukemia. J Biol Rhythms. 2011;26:136–48.
Zhu Y, Stevens RG, Hoffman AE, FitzGerald LM, Kwon EM, Ostrander EA, et al. Testing the circadian gene hypothesis in prostate cancer: a population-based case-control study. Cancer Res. 2009;69:9315–22.
Qi C, Gery S, Dashti A, Dong Y, Yan Z, Jiang G, et al. A role for the clock gene Per1 in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7619–25.
Hsu CM, Lin SF, Lu CT, Lin PM, Yang MY. Altered expression of circadian clock genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:149–55.
The author has no support or funding to this research.
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Competing interests The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Salavaty, A. Carcinogenic effects of circadian disruption: an epigenetic viewpoint. Chin J Cancer 34, 38 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-015-0043-5
- Circadian rhythms
- Circadian disruption