- Open Access
Clinical trials for treating recurrent head and neck cancer with boron neutron capture therapy using the Tsing-Hua Open Pool Reactor
© The Author(s) 2018
- Received: 6 January 2018
- Accepted: 4 May 2018
- Published: 19 June 2018
Head and neck (HN) cancer is an endemic disease in Taiwan, China. Locally recurrent HN cancer after full-dose irradiation poses a therapeutic challenge, and boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) may be a solution that could provide durable local control with tolerable toxicity. The Tsing-Hua Open Pool Reactor (THOR) at National Tsing-Hua University in Hsin-Chu, provides a high-quality epithermal neutron source for basic and clinical BNCT research. Our first clinical trial, entitled “A phase I/II trial of boron neutron capture therapy for recurrent head and neck cancer at THOR”, was carried out between 2010 and 2013. A total of 17 patients with 23 recurrent HN tumors who had received high-dose photon irradiation were enrolled in the study. The fructose complex of l-boronophenylalanine was used as a boron carrier, and a two-fraction BNCT treatment regimen at 28-day intervals was used for each patient. Toxicity was acceptable, and although the response rate was high (12/17), re-recurrence within or near the radiation site was common. To obtain better local control, another clinical trial entitled “A phase I/II trial of boron neutron capture therapy combined with image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) for locally recurrent HN cancer” was initiated in 2014. The first administration of BNCT was performed according to our previous protocol, and IG-IMRT was initiated 28 days after BNCT. As of May 2017, seven patients have been treated with this combination. The treatment-related toxicity was similar to that previously observed with two BNCT applications. Three patients had a complete response, but locoregional recurrence was the major cause of failure despite initially good responses. Future clinical trials combining BNCT with other local or systemic treatments will be carried out for recurrent HN cancer patients at THOR.
- Head and neck cancer
- Boron neutron capture therapy
- Tsing-Hua Open Pool Reactor
Head and neck (HN) cancer has a high frequency worldwide , but in Taiwan, China, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity is an endemic disease due to the habit of chewing betel nuts. In 2014, more than 7000 individuals were diagnosed with HN cancer . Despite progress in multimodality treatment for this disease, locoregional recurrence is common and poses a therapeutic challenge, especially for patients who already received high-dose photon irradiation [3–5]. Consequently, there is a pressing need for other treatment options for recurrent HN cancer patients.
Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a type of particle radiotherapy based on the nuclear capture and fission reactions that occur when non-radioactive boron (10B) is irradiated with thermal neutrons (< 1 eV) to yield high-energy alpha-particles (4He) and recoiling lithium (7Li) nuclei. The path-lengths of these particles are approximately one cell diameter making BNCT a potentially ideal way to selectively destroy malignant cells and spare normal tissues if a sufficiently high concentration of 10B is localized in tumor cells . Based on a literature review, high response rates (60–83%) and low toxicity rates were reported after BNCT for recurrent HN cancer in both single- and two-fraction treatment protocols [7–9]. As reported a more recent Finnish study, only one had grade 4 toxicity among 29 evaluated patients who received BNCT. The incidence of grade 3 toxicity ranged from 20% to 54%. BNCT for recurrent HN cancer patients was initiated in Taiwan, China in 2010 based on the Japanese and Finnish studies [7–9].
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the fractionated BNCT clinical trial
1. Patients with locoregionally recurrent and histologically proved malignancy of the head and neck
2. Prior conventional radiotherapy administered has been given for the disease (except melanoma)
3. Bi-dimensionally measurable disease by MRI and/or CT scan and ≦ 12 cm in the largest dimension
4. Age > 18 and < 80 years, ECOG performance status ≦ 2
5. WBC > 2.5 × 109/L, neutrophil count > 1.0 × 109/L, platelet count > 7.5 × 109/L, serum creatinine < 1.25 × ULN
6. Tumor to normal tissue (T/N) ratio for BPA > 2.5 by 18F-BPA PET scan
1. Lymphoma or other tumor type that is expected to respond to chemotherapy or conventional radiation therapy that can be safely given
2. Patients who had an effective standard treatment option like surgery or radiotherapy available
3. Distant metastasis outside the head and neck regions
4. Expected life less than 3 months
5. A time interval less than 3 months from previous radiation therapy
6. Concurrent systemic cancer treatment including chemotherapy or target therapy
8. Restless patients who were unable to lie or sit in a cast for 30–60 min
Patient demographics and tumor characteristics in the fractionated BNCT clinical trial
Accumulated dose of prior RT (Gy)
Tumor diameter (cm)
136.4 in 2 courses
120 in 2 courses
136 in 2 courses
122 in 2 courses
Spindle cell sarcoma
107 in 2 courses
105 in 2 courses
136 in 2 courses
125.9 in 2 courses
95 in 2 courses
136 in 2 courses
From the experience of our first clinical BNCT trial and other studies [7, 9], re-recurrences near re-irradiated sites were common, despite initially good responses. We hypothesized that by irradiating a larger field around the recurrent GTV with photons, we could obtain better local control IG-IMRT had been used alone as salvage treatment for recurrent HN cancer with acceptable toxicity . Therefore, we developed a new protocol in 2013 combining IG-IMRT with BNCT. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were similar to our previous two-fraction BNCT protocol, except that a longer interval (at least 6 months) was necessary between previous RT and BNCT. BNCT treatment planning was done as prescribed for the first fraction in the previous protocol. For IG-IMRT planning, a selected margin (3–5 mm) around the GTV was added to generate the clinical target volume (CTV), and an additional 3-mm margin was added around the CTV to generate the planning target volume. In two patients, lymphatic drainage areas adjacent to the GTVs were also included in the CTV. Additionally, special attention was paid to limit the dose to critical organs such as the carotid artery, spinal cord, brain stem and mandible. Patients were followed up similar to our previous protocol. After approval of the new protocol in 2014, we recruited 9 eligible patients, 4 of whom had squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx, 3 has squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, one mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland, and one osteogenic sarcoma of the mandible. The median radiation dose before BNCT was 66 Gy (range 60–102 Gy).
Seven patients were treated with combined therapy, one with BNCT alone due to severe acute toxicity, and another due to old age and the risk of carotid bleeding. The median BNCT doses were, 19.4 Gy-Eq and IG-IMRT: 45 Gy (in 25 fractions). The median follow-up time was 11.7 months (range 4.8–25.9 months). Regarding acute toxicities, almost all had low-grade oral mucositis, radiation dermatitis and alopecia, which were similar to that observed in the previous two-fraction BNCT protocol . Regarding grade 3 toxicity, dysphagia and tumor pain were seen in two patients, infection in one, and facial edema in one. One patient with a recurrent oral cancer showed grade 4 oral bleeding. He was successfully treated by carotid artery embolization. Another patient had grade 4 dyspnea following facial edema and his symptoms subsided following tracheostomy. Three patients showed CR, as evidenced by PET scans 3 months after combined treatment, and another 3 showed PR by MRI. The other 3 had stable disease. The 1-year overall survival rate for all patients was 56%, and one patient was disease-free 25.9 months after combined treatment.
With chemotherapy alone, most patients who are diagnosed with inoperable, locoregionally recurrent HN cancer at previously irradiated sites die of the disease within a few months . Re-irradiation with BNCT with limited toxicity may constitute successful salvage therapy for these patients. In reality, further local recurrence after BNCT is a major cause of treatment failure. There are many possible explanations for local failure following BNCT, including insufficient uptake and non-homogeneous BPA distribution within the tumor, insufficient depth penetration by epithermal neutrons, and an insufficient radiation dose or coverage of the CTV. By combining image-guided fractionated photon therapy with BNCT, we hoped that the second trial would decrease the recurrence rate following BNCT without significantly increasing toxicity. Theoretically, local control should be improved when a larger volume around the recurrent tumor bed (i.e., the CTV) is further treated with photon therapy through IMRT, because the BNCT dose to the adjacent normal tissue would be low. Thus, it may be appropriate to choose an “adequate” margin surrounding the GTV based on previous RT fields, dosages, nearby critical organs, and the risk of re-recurrence. Because the patient numbers of both trials were small and they had disparate primary sites, histopathology, clinical staging, and accumulated radiation doses before BNCT, it was difficult to compare the efficacy and toxicity of the two trials. However, from the dose volume histograms of BNCT and IMRT plans, the dose to normal tissues was often lower with BNCT than with IMRT in the same patient. We hypothesized that better local control with BNCT with combined IMRT, covering a larger tissue volume, at the expense of more severe toxicity, compared to a second application of BNCT. However, it is still too early to draw any conclusions regarding the second trial. Nevertheless, it remains very challenging to treat recurrent HN cancer patients with further radiation, even with a target type of radiotherapy such as BNCT. Recently, promising results from some clinical trials testing systemic treatments, such as molecularly-targeted therapy and immunotherapy for recurrent HN cancer have been reported [20, 21]. In the future, multimodality treatment combining BNCT with new therapeutic approaches such as the use of pulsed ultrasound  should be evaluated to avoid excessive normal tissue injury and obtain more durable tumor responses.
From our experience at THOR, BNCT either alone or combined with fractionated photon radiation resulted in a high response rate for selected recurrent HN cancer patients. Some patients survived more than 4 years, but further locoregional recurrence was the major cause of treatment failure. The few severe complications such as carotid arterial bleeding and laryngeal edema were successfully managed. Finally, we believe that additional modifications of our protocol could lead to even better treatment results for this group of patients.
Y-WHL was responsible for dose calculation of THORplan for all our BNCT cases. F-IC was responsible for blood boron concentration measurement for all BNCT cases. S-HJ was responsible for supervising the reactor operation for all BNCT cases. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors thank the supports from our radiation oncology colleagues and head and neck team of Taipei Veterans General Hospital. We also thank Prof. Koji Ono for his teaching in BNCT, Dr. Leena Kankaanranta for her comments on our trial protocol and Prof. Rolf Barth for editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because the second clinical trial is not completed yet. However, the data from the first trial are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Consent for publication
Not required (both patients shown in the figures are unidentifiable and expired).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Both trials were approved by the institution review board of Taipei Veterans General Hospital (No. 98-03-04) and Taiwan Food and Drug Administration (No. 2012-06-016A#7).
The two trials were both supported by “Ministry of science and technology of Taiwan”, China.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Gupta B, Johnson NW, Kumar N. Global epidemiology of head and neck cancers: a continuing challenge. Oncology. 2016;91:13–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taiwan cancer registry annual report. 2014.Google Scholar
- Wong SJ, Machtay M, Li Y. Locally recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancer: concurrent re-irradiation and chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2653–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen AM, Farwell DG, Luu Q, Cheng S, Donald PJ, Purdy JA. Prospective trial of high-dose reirradiation using daily image guidance with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for recurrent and second primary head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:669–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dawson LA, Myers LL, Bradford CR, Chepeha DB, Hogikyan ND, Teknos TN, et al. Conformal re-irradiation of recurrent and new primary head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:377–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barth RF, Vicente MG, Harling OK, Kiger WS 3rd, Riley KJ, Binns PJ, et al. Current status of boron neutron capture therapy of high grade gliomas and recurrent head and neck cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:146.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki M, Sakurai Y, Nagata K, Kinashi Y, Masunaga S, Ono K, et al. Impact of intra-arterial administration of boron compounds on dose-volume histograms in boron neutron capture therapy for recurrent head-and-neck tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:1523–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kankaanranta L, Seppala T, Koivunoro H, Saarilahti K, Atula T, Collan J et al. Boron neutron capture therapy in the treatment of locally recurred head and neck cancer. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys. 2007;69:475–482.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kankaanranta L, Seppala T, Koivunoro H, Saarilahti K, Atula T, Collan J, et al. Boron neutron capture therapy in the treatment of locally recurred head-and-neck cancer: final analysis of a phase I/II trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:e67–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu YWH, Huang TT, Jiang SH, Liu HM. Renovation of epithermal neutron beam for BNCT at THOR. Appl Radiat Isot. 2004;61:1039–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li HS, Liu YWH, Lee CY, Lin TY, Hsu FY. Verification of the accuracy of BNCT treatment planning system THORplan. Appl Radiat Isot. 2009;67:S122–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin TY, Liu YWH. Development and verification of THORplan—a BNCT treatment planning system for THOR. Appl Radiat Isot. 2011;69:1878–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu YW, Chang CT, Yeh LY, Wang LW, Lin TY. BNCT treatment planning for superficial and deep-seated tumors: experience from clinical trial of recurrent head and neck cancer at THOR. Appl Radiat Isot. 2015;106:121–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang LW, Chen YW, Ho CY, Liu YWH, Chou FI, Liu YH, et al. Fractionated boron neutron capture therapy in locally recurrent head and neck cancer: a prospective phase I/II trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95:396–403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoshino K, Suzuki A, Mori Y, Kakihana H, Honda C, Mishima Y, et al. Improvement of solubility of p-boronophenylalanine by complex formation with monosaccharides. Strahlenther Onkol. 1989;165:127–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu HT, Liu YWH, Lin TY, Wang LW. BNCT treatment planning of recurrent head-and-neck cancer using THORplan. Appl Radiat Isot. 2011;69(12):1907–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ono K, Masunaga S, Kinashi Y, Nagata K, Suzuki M, Sakurai Y, et al. Neutron irradiation under continuous BPA injection for solving the problem of heterogeneous distribution of BPA. In: Nakagawa Y, Kobayashi T, Fukuda H (eds). Proceeding 12th international conference on neutron capture therapy. Takamatsu; 2006. p. 27–30.Google Scholar
- Anderson KA, Tschirgi ML. Determination of trace boron in microsamples of biological tissues. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1997;60:27–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang LW, Wang SJ, Chu PY, Ho CY, Jiang SH, Liu YW, et al. BNCT for locally recurrent head and neck cancer: preliminary clinical experience from a phase I/II trial at Tsing Hua open-pool reactor. Appl Radiat Isot. 2011;69(12):1803–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Machiels JP, Haddad RI, Fayette J, Licitra LF, Tahara M, Vermorken JB, et al. Afatinib versus methotrexate as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing on or after platinum-based therapy (LUX-Head & Neck 1): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:583–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1856–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Barth RF, Zhang Z, Liu T. A realistic appraisal of boron neutron capture therapy as a cancer treatment modality. Cancer Communications 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-018-0280-5 Google Scholar