Skip to main content
Download PDF

Novel germline mutations in FLCN gene identified in two Chinese patients with Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome

Chinese Journal of Cancer volume 36, Article number: 4 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Birt–Hogg–Dubé (BHD) syndrome, a hereditary renal cancer syndrome caused by mutations in the folliculin (FLCN) gene, is characterized by the presence of fibrofolliculomas, pulmonary cysts, spontaneous pneumothorax, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Few BHD syndrome cases have been reported in Asian countries, and cutaneous presentations are relatively rare in Asian patients. Asian BHD patients may be misdiagnosed due to their atypical manifestations. Here, we report two Chinese BHD patients with novel FLCN mutations (c.946-947delAG in exon 9 and c.770-772delCCT in exon 7). Both of them had RCC and spontaneous pneumothorax without fibrofolliculomas. In patients with RCC and pulmonary cysts but without cutaneous lesions, screening for mutations in the FLCN gene should be performed, especially for those with a family history of RCC or pulmonary cysts (pneumothorax).

Background

Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome (BHD, OMIM #135150) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary disease first described by Birt et al. in 1977 [1]. This syndrome is characterized by the presence of fibrofolliculomas (FFs), pulmonary cysts, spontaneous pneumothorax, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [2]. Germline mutations in the folliculin (FLCN) gene mapped to chromosome 17p11.2 were identified in BHD patients in 2002 [3]. FLCN mutations have also been detected in isolated familial spontaneous pneumothorax and familial clear cell carcinoma [4]. FLCN is considered a tumor suppressor gene and interacts with the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathways. The spectrum of FLCN gene mutations has been outlined in several reports and has been summarized in a database (http://www.lovd.nl/flcn) [5]; however, the genotype-phenotype associations between the FLCN gene and BHD syndrome are not well known.

Most BHD cases have been identified in Caucasians. Only several reports of compiled BHD cases in the literature have been from Asia, and most of them have been from Japan [6–8]. Many of the BHD patients from Asia have not had all symptoms (FFs, pulmonary cysts, spontaneous pneumothorax, and RCC) [8]. The most life-threatening manifestation of BHD syndrome is renal cancer, which is present in 27%–41% of patients [2, 9, 10]. RCCs in BHD patients can be multiple or bilateral and include various histopathologic types, such as hybrid oncocytic tumor, chromophobe RCC, clear-cell RCC, oncocytoma, and papillary RCC [10, 11].

Here, we report two Chinese BHD patients with two novel germline FLCN mutations. Analysis of these patients was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients and their families.

Case report

Case 1

A 54-year-old man was found to have asymptomatic, bilateral renal tumors by ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) (Fig. 1a, b). CT scan also showed left pneumothorax (Fig. 1c). No apparent cutaneous lesions were found by careful inspection and palpation of the skin. The patient had a history of spontaneous pneumothorax at the age of 30. His son also had a history of spontaneous pneumothorax at the age of 17. Open bilateral and partial nephrectomies were performed. Histopathologic examination revealed that the tumor in the left kidney was chromophobe RCC, nuclear grade G2 (partial G1), and 1.7 cm × 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm in size (Fig. 1d); the tumor in the right kidney was clear-cell RCC, nuclear grade G2, and 5.0 cm × 4.7 cm × 4.5 cm in size (Fig. 1e).

Fig. 1
figure1

Lesions and folliculin (FLCN) mutation in case 1. a Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan with intravenous contrast reveals a renal mass in the upper pole of the left kidney (arrow). b Abdominal CT scan with intravenous contrast reveals a renal mass in the right kidney (arrow). c CT scan shows left pneumothorax (arrow). d Histopathology of the left renal tumor shows a monotonous cellular pattern with mild nuclear pleomorphism and abundant, partly eosinophilic cytoplasm with a perinuclear halo (chromophobe renal cell carcinoma). e Histopathology of the right renal tumor shows clear cytoplasm surrounded by a distinct cell membrane (clear cell carcinoma). f Both the patient and his son have a deletion of AG (c.946-947delAG) in exon 9 of the FLCN gene, which causes a frameshift mutation starting at the 316th amino acid (p.316fs388x). The deleted bases are underlined in the normal sequence

Full size image

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples collected from the patient and his son. Mutation examination revealed that the proband and his son carried a deletion of two bases (AG) at nucleotides c.946-947 in exon 9 (c.946-947delAG) of the FLCN gene (Fig. 1f), which caused a frameshift mutation starting at the 316th amino acid (p.316fs388x). No RCC was detected by abdominal CT scan on the son.

Case 2

A 37-year-old man presented with an asymptomatic right renal mass detected by ultrasonography and CT (Fig. 2a). No apparent cutaneous lesions were found by careful inspection and palpation of the skin. The patient had a history of spontaneous pneumothorax on both sides and underwent pulmonary bullectomy on the right side at the age of 30. His father had a history of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax starting at the age of 28 and died of stoke at the age of 63. His uncle had a history of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax starting at the age of 24 and died of an accident at the age of 56. Open partial nephrectomy was performed on the patient. Histopathologic examination revealed that the tumor was chromophobe RCC, nuclear grade G2, and 2.2 cm × 2.0 cm × 2.0 cm in size (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure2

Lesion and FLCN mutation in case 2. a CT scan reveals a mass in the right kidney (arrow). b Histopathology of the resected tumor shows tumor cells with transparent, slightly reticulated cytoplasm with prominent cell membranes (chromophobe renal cell carcinoma). c The patient has a deletion of CCT (c.770-772delCCT) in exon 7 of the FLCN gene, which results in deletion of the 257th serine residue (p.257delS). The deleted bases are underlined in the normal sequence

Full size image

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples collected from the patient and his family members. Mutation examination revealed that the proband carried a deletion of three bases (CCT) at nucleotides c.770-772 in exon 7 (c.770-772delCCT) (Fig. 2c), resulting in deletion of the 257th serine residue (p.257delS). No FLCN mutations were found in any other members of the patient’s family.

Discussion

Most reported cases of BHD have been from Western countries, and reports of cases from Asia are rare, likely due to the lack of awareness and atypical manifestations of this disease in Asian patients. Identification of BHD patients is usually based on dermatologic signs. However, Kunogi et al. [6] found that among 30 Japanese BHD patients, only 6 (20.0%) had cutaneous lesions, 1 (3.3%) was histologically diagnosed with FFs, and 29 (96.7%) had pneumothorax. Further, Furuya and Nakatani [7] reported that 13 (28.8%) patients had FFs, 40 (88.9%) had pulmonary cysts, and 9 (20.0%) had RCC among 45 BHD patients from 19 Japanese families. In addition, Murakami et al. [8] compiled 62 BHD cases from Asia and found that FFs were detected in 17 (27.4%), pulmonary cysts in 49 (79.0%), and RCC in 11 (17.7%). In comparison, Toro et al. [9] found that among 51 BHD families in the United States, 46 (90.2%) had FFs, 45 (88.2%) had pulmonary cysts, and 25 (49.0%) had renal tumors. Kluger et al. [12] reported 22 patients from ten unrelated families with BHD in France; 18 (81.8%) patients had FFs, 16 (72.7%) had pulmonary cysts or a history of pneumothorax, and 10 (45.5%) had renal tumors. Therefore, the incidence of FFs may be lower among Asian BHD patients compared with the higher incidence of 80%–90% reported among patients from the United States and Europe, whereas the pulmonary cyst incidences are similar between patients from Asian and Western countries. FLCN mutation screening is recommended for patients with RCC and pulmonary cysts without cutaneous lesions, especially for those with a clear family history of RCC or pulmonary cysts/pneumothorax.

In this report, case 1 had two pathologic types (chromophobe and clear-cell) of RCC. BHD patients are each likely to have various types of RCC [13], especially those with tumors with composite oncocytoma or chromophobe RCC histology [14]; these pathologies include the known familial hereditary RCCs, such as von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome, BHD syndrome, hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma (HPRCC), hereditary leiomyomatosis renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC), and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Pavlovich et al. [10] summarized clinical data of 124 BHD patients with 84 resected renal tumors, of which 56 (67%) were hybrid oncocytic tumors, 19 (23%) were chromophobe RCC, 6 (7%) were clear-cell RCC, and 3 (4%) were renal oncocytoma. Urologists should thus be aware that the presence of chromophobe/oncocytic renal neoplasms, especially those that are bilateral or multifocal, may indicate a diagnosis of BHD syndrome, even if dermatologic lesions are absent [11].

Over 100 unique mutations in the coding region of FLCN have been identified. Most of these mutations are frameshift, nonsense, insertion/deletion, or splice site mutations, resulting in truncation and inactivation of the encoded protein folliculin [15]. However, no clear genotype–phenotype associations between FLCN mutation type or location and skin, lung, or renal manifestations have been identified to date; only a significantly lower frequency of renal neoplasia has been reported in patients with a deleted cytosine in the exon 11 mutational “hot spot” compared with the patients with an inserted cytosine at this location [15, 16]. A definite diagnosis of BHD can only be made when a pathogenic germline FLCN mutation is detected. Detection of an FLCN gene mutation not only confirms the diagnosis in suspected patients but also enables the diagnosis of at-risk family members with this disease. Once RCC is detected in BHD patients, it can be closely monitored as long as the dominant lesion is less than 3 cm in diameter. Surgical resection is recommended when the solid lesion or solid portion of a mixed lesion exceeds the threshold diameter of 3 cm [10]. For patients with bilateral renal tumors measuring greater than 3 cm, staged surgeries in two separate settings are recommended [11]. The tumor growth rate and location are additional factors that should be considered [2, 11]. Recently, a kidney-specific knockout model was developed by disrupting mouse FLCN in proximal tubules [17]. This model provides a valuable tool for further study of FLCN-deficient renal tumorigenesis and for tests of new drugs (such as mTOR inhibitors) for the treatment of BHD-associated renal tumors.

Here, we report two Chinese patients with RCC and spontaneous pneumothorax who were diagnosed with BHD syndrome. Both patients underwent FLCN gene mutation screening and were found to have two novel mutations (c.946-947delAG and c.770-772delCCT) that have not been reported previously. Importantly, skin FFs were absent in both patients. These findings demonstrate, particularly to urologists, the importance of performing FLCN gene mutation screening for patients with RCC and pulmonary cysts.

References

  1. 1.

    Birt AR, Hogg GR, Dubé WJ. Hereditary multiple fibrofolliculomas with trichodiscomas and acrochordons. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113(12):1674–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Menko FH, van Steensel MA, Giraud S, Friis-Hansen L, Richard S, Ungari S, et al. Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome: diagnosis and management. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(12):1199–206.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nickerson ML, Warren MB, Toro JR, Matrosova V, Glenn G, Turner ML, et al. Mutations in a novel gene lead to kidney tumors, lung wall defects, and benign tumors of the hair follicle in patients with the Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome. Cancer Cell. 2002;2(2):157–64.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Menko FH, Johannesma PC, van Moorselaar RJA, Reinhard R, van Waesberghe JH, Thunnissen E, et al. A de novo FLCN mutation in a patient with spontaneous pneumothorax and renal cancer; A clinical and molecular evaluation. Fam Cancer. 2013;12(3):373–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lim DH, Rehal PK, Nahorski MS, Macdonald F, Claessens T, Van Geel M, et al. A new locus-specific database (LSDB) for mutations in the folliculin (FLCN) gene. Hum Mutat. 2010;31(1):E1043–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kunogi M, Kurihara M, Ikegami TS, Kobayashi T, Shindo N, Kumasaka T, et al. Clinical and genetic spectrum of Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome patients in whom pneumothorax and/or multiple lung cysts are the presenting feature. J Med Genet. 2010;47:281–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Furuya M, Nakatani Y. Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome: clinicopathological features of the lung. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(3):178–86.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Murakami Y, Wataya-Kaneda M, Tanaka M, Takahashi A, Tsujimura A, Inoue K, et al. Two Japanese cases of Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome with pulmonary cysts, fibrofolliculomas, and renal cell carcinomas. Case Rep Dermatol. 2014;6(1):20–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Toro JR, Wei MH, Glenn GM, Weinreich M, Toure O, Vocke C, et al. BHD mutations, clinical and molecular genetic investigations of Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome: a new series of 50 families and a review of published reports. J Med Genet. 2008;45(6):321–31.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pavlovich CP, Grubb RL 3rd, Hurley K, Glenn GM, Toro J, Schmidt LS, et al. Evaluation and management of renal tumors in the Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome. J Urol. 2005;173(5):1482–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stamatakis L, Metwalli AR, Middelton LA, Marston Linehan W. Diagnosis and management of BHD-associated kidney cancer. Fam Cancer. 2013;12(3):397–402.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kluger N, Giraud S, Coupier I, Avril MF, Dereure O, Guillot B, et al. Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome: clinical and genetic studies of 10 French families. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162(3):527–37.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Linehan WM, Pinto PA, Bratslavsky G, Pfaffenroth E, Merino M, Vocke CD, et al. Hereditary kidney cancer: unique opportunity for disease-based therapy. Cancer. 2009;115(S10):2252–61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sircar K, Rao P, Jonasch E, Monzon FA, Tamboli P. Contemporary approach to diagnosis and classification of renal cell carcinoma with mixed histologic features. Chin J Cancer. 2013;32(6):303–11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Schmidt LS. Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome: from gene discovery to molecularly targeted therapies. Fam Cancer. 2013;12(3):357–64.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Schmidt LS, Nickerson ML, Warren MB, Glenn GM, Toro JR, Merino MJ, et al. Germline BHD-mutation spectrum and phenotype analysis of a large cohort of families with Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76(6):1023–33.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chen J, Huang D, Rubera I, Futami K, Wang P, Zickert P, et al. Disruption of tubular Flcn expression as a mouse model for renal tumor induction. Kidney Int. 2015;88(5):1057–69.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

The work presented here was carried out in collaboration between all authors. TL performed the gene test and drafted the manuscript. XN analyzed and interpreted the patient data. QH analyzed the pathologic data. KG designed this case report, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

To Prof. Dingfang Bu, with thanks, for critical reading and helpful discussions. Thanks to Dr. Kai Zhao and Dr. Yuan Jiang for the assistance with medical imaging. The authors would also like to acknowledge the patients’ contribution in this report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 81172418) and the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (Grant Number: 7142160).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, No. 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China

    Teng Li, Xianghui Ning, Qun He & Kan Gong

Authors
  1. Teng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xianghui Ning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qun He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kan Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kan Gong.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, T., Ning, X., He, Q. et al. Novel germline mutations in FLCN gene identified in two Chinese patients with Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome. Chin J Cancer 36, 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0172-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome
  • The folliculin (FLCN) gene
  • Mutation
  • Renal cell carcinoma

Cancer Communications

ISSN: 2523-3548

Contact us