Skip to main content

Table 5 Multivariable Cox regression analysis for predictors of late complications related to stoma and ureteroileal anastomosis

From: An improved ileal conduit surgery for bladder cancer with fewer complications

Variable

Stoma-related complications

Ureteroileal anastomosis-related complications

HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

Age (> 62 vs. ≤ 62)

0.238 (0.023–2.220)

0.094

0.042 (0.001–1.894)

0.103

Gender (female vs. male)

1.674 (0.401–8.994)

0.139

1.266 (0.108–4.569)

0.292

Smoking (yes vs. no)

0.958 (0.084–10.930)

0.973

0.055 (0.002–1.435)

0.081

CCI (> 2 vs. ≤ 2)

1.950 (0.330–11.509)

0.461

1.149 (0.111–11.855)

0.207

ASA (> 2 vs. ≤ 2)

1.852 (0.165–10.225)

0.203

1.289 (0.041–13.672)

0.185

Prior pelvic irradiation (yes vs. no)

1.938 (0.629–9.369)

0.292

2.325 (0.537–8.572)

0.420

Preoperative hydronephrosis (yes vs. no)

1.980 (0.188–10.980)

0.287

3.759 (0.470–14.456)

0.119

Pathologic T stage

 T2 vs. T1

2.259 (1.094–8.459)

0.043

2.875 (1.012–5.297)

0.032

 T3 vs. T2

1.893 (0.154–8.349)

0.174

1.432 (0.023–11.242)

0.282

 T4 vs. T3

1.564 (0.155–11.025)

0.131

1.973 (0.142–9.126)

0.259

Pathologic N stage (N + vs. N0)

2.252 (0.245–12.372)

0.219

3.123 (0.263–10.282)

0.075

Adjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs. no)

2.036 (0.242–6.734)

0.178

1.552 (0.018–6.723)

0.571

BMI (> 21.8 vs. ≤ 21.8)

2.594 (0.121–7.783)

0.067

1.934 (0.119–6.524)

0.053

Year of surgery (> 2009 vs. ≤ 2009)

2.125 (0.314–8.875)

0.257

2.538 (0.423–7.243)

0.689

  1. HR Hazard ratio