Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate analysis of prognostic factors of overall survival in 40 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with malignant fistulae

From: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with enteral nutrition support: a radical treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with malignant fistulae

Variable

HR (95% CI)

P value

ECOG performance status (0–1 vs. 2)

0.76 (0.26–1.87)

0.567

Primary tumor location (upper vs. middle vs. lower)

0.44 (0.19–1.00)

0.051

T category of primary tumor

1.95 (0.68–5.56)

0.213

(T4 vs. non-T4)

Clinical stage of primary tumor (stage II vs. stage III vs. stage IV)

1.55 (0.68–3.57)

0.300

NRS score before CCRT (≥3 vs. <3)

1.13 (0.69–1.86)

0.631

NRS score after CCRT (≥3 vs. <3)

5.14 (1.72–15.31)

0.003

Increased NRS score after CCRT (yes vs. no)

0.32 (0.12–0.86)

0.024

Hemoglobin level after CCRT (>110 vs. ≤110 g/L)

1.56 (0.72–3.24)

0.724

Fistula closure (yes vs. no)

3.78 (1.36–10.61)

0.011

Fistula site (tracheobronchus vs. mediastinum)

1.55 (0.50–4.82)

0.447

Radiation dose (≥60 vs. <60 Gy)

0.46 (0.17–1.23)

0.096

Tumor response after CCRT (CR vs. non-CR)

3.53 (2.01–6.18)

<0.001

  1. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; NRS, nutrition risk screening; CCRT, concurrent chemoradiotherapy; CR, complete response
  2. The italicized p values are statistically significant