Skip to main content

Table 2 Associations between PDCD4 down-regulation and the clinicopathologic parameters of patients with solid tumors

From: The clinical association of programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4) with solid tumors and its prognostic significance: a meta-analysis

Parameter

Study subjects

Reference(s)

Total cases

PDCD4 expression (cases)a

OR

95% CI

I 2 (%)

P

Negative

Positive

Tumor size (large vs. small)

Tumor type

 Digestive system cancer

[7, 14–16]

530

114 vs. 169

84 vs. 163

1.49

1.00–2.22

51.3

0.08

 Urinary system cancer

[17]

66

6 vs. 29

5 vs. 26

1.08

0.29–3.95

NA

NA

Total

 

596

120 vs. 198

89 vs. 189

1.45

0.99-2.12

40.8

0.13

T category (T3 + 4 vs. T1 + 2)

Tumor type

 Digestive system cancer

[15, 19]

238

96 vs. 24

95 vs. 23

0.98

0.46-2.08

25.1

0.26

 Urinary system cancer

[17]

66

22 vs. 13

8 vs. 23

4.87

1.69–14.0

NA

NA

 Head and neck cancer

[18]

190

44 vs. 73

16 vs. 57

2.15

1.10–4.19

NA

NA

Total

 

494

162 vs. 110

119 vs. 103

1.68

0.82–3.43

60.8

0.04

N category (N+ vs. N−)

Tumor type

 Digestive system cancer

[15, 19, 23]

465

164 vs. 119

91 vs. 91

1.02

0.53-1.93

58.5

0.05

 Head and neck cancer

[20, 21]

114

19 vs. 36

11 vs. 48

3.39

0.59-19.53

55.3

0.14

 Respiratory system cancer

[22]

124

44 vs. 59

11 vs. 10

0.68

0.26–1.74

NA

NA

Population

 Asian

[15, 19–21, 23]

579

183 vs. 155

102 vs. 139

1.26

0.68–2.33

58.8

0.02

 European

[22]

124

44 vs. 59

11 vs. 10

0.68

0.26–1.74

NA

NA

Total

 

703

227 vs. 214

113 vs. 149

1.15

0.67–1.68

55.4

0.03

M category (M+ vs. M−)

Tumor type

 Urinary system tumor

[17]

66

22 vs. 13

8 vs. 23

4.87

1.69–14.0

NA

NA

 Head and neck cancer

[18]

190

10 vs. 107

4 vs. 69

1.61

0.49–5.34

NA

NA

 Digestive system cancer

[19, 23]

213

4 vs. 117

4 vs. 88

0.72

0.09–5.83

54

0.14

Total

 

469

36 vs. 237

16 vs. 180

2.51

1.20–5.26

46.2

0.10

  1. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NA not available
  2. aThe data of PDCD4 expression are expressed as the number of cases in the former subgroup versus the number of cases in the latter subgroup, e.g., the number of cases in the large tumor subgroup versus the number of cases in the small tumor subgroup