Skip to main content

Table 4 Pooled ORs and 95 % CIs of TLR3 polymorphisms in this meta-analysis

From: TLR3 gene polymorphisms in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

SNP

Number of studies

M1

M2

M3

M4

Number of studies

M5

OR (95 % CI)

P

I 2 (%)

OR (95 % CI)

P

I2 (%)

OR (95 % CI)

P

I2 (%)

OR (95 % CI)

P

I2 (%)

OR (95 % CI)

P

I2 (%)

rs3775290 (C13766T, C > T)

5

1.04

0.854*

70.0

1.38

0.110

0.0

1.09

0.640*

69.4

1.41

0.082

0.0

6

1.06

0.550

59.3

 

(0.72-1.49)

  

(0.93-2.06)

  

(0.77-1.53)

  

(0.96-2.08)

   

(0.87-1.30)

  

rs3775291 (G13909A, L412F, G > A)

8

1.12

0.056*

53.9

1.13

0.335*

66.5

1.12

0.054*

58.6

1.08

0.507*

65.2

9

1.09

0.064*

59.5

(1.00-1.26)

  

(0.88-1.45)

  

(1.00-1.26)

  

(0.86-1.37)

   

(1.00-1.19)

  

rs3775292 (C/G, intron 3, C > G)

4

0.96

0.554*

54.5

0.93

0.500

34.7

0.97

0.476

23.1

0.94

0.554

49.9

4

0.97

0.416

0.0

(0.83-1.11)

  

(0.75-1.15)

  

(0.89-1.06)

  

(0.76-1.16)

   

(0.90-1.05)

  

rs5743312 (C9948T, intron 3, C > T)

3

1.02

0.832

0.0

1.88

<0.001

0.0

1.08

0.267

0.0

1.86

<0.001

0.0

4

1.11

0.047

7.1

(0.88-1.17)

  

(1.33-2.67)

  

(0.94-1.23)

  

(1.32-2.63)

   

(1.00-1.24)

  
  1. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. *The heterogeneity exists; a random-effect model based on the DerSimonian and Laird method or a fixed-effect model based on the Mantel-Haenszel method was used. M1: Aa vs. AA, heterozygote comparison; M2: aa vs. AA, homozygote comparison; M3: Aa + aa vs. AA, dominant model; M4: aa vs. AA + Aa, recessive model; M5: a vs. A, allelic model (A indicates wild allele, a indicates variant allele). The bold means the significant results.