Skip to main content

Table 5 Dosimetric comparison of plans with pre-correction margins and plans with post-correction margins for the PTVs in 40 NPC patients

From: Dosimetric benefit to organs at risk following margin reductions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Target

Dose index

Plan with pre-correction margins

Plan with post-correction margins

Difference

P value

PTV_7000

D2% (Gy)

76.2ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.84

75.97ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.79

0.28ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.57

0.003

Ā 

D50% (Gy)

73.79ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.43

73.59ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.38

0.19ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.32

<0.001

Ā 

D95% (Gy)

71.05ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.32

71.06ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.26

āˆ’0.01ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.16

0.738

Ā 

D98% (Gy)

69.53ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.34

69.80ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.01

āˆ’0.27ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.44

<0.001

Ā 

HI

0.09ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.03

0.08ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.02

0.01ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.01

<0.001

PTV_6000

D2% (Gy)

75.77ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.85

75.44ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.80

0.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.48

<0.001

Ā 

D50% (Gy)

71.18ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.29

70.79ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.22

0.39ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.30

<0.001

Ā 

D95% (Gy)

64.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.06

63.85ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.06

0.16ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.44

0.030

Ā 

D98% (Gy)

62.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.04

62.34ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.07

āˆ’0.02ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.45

0.805

Ā 

HI

0.19ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.02

0.18ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.02

0.01ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.01

0.010

PTV_5600

D2% (Gy)

74.60ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.04

74.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.06

0.27ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.38

<0.001

Ā 

D50% (Gy)

62.58ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.77

62.41ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.83

0.17ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.40

0.009

Ā 

D95% (Gy)

57.81ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.56

57.72ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.54

0.09ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.22

0.018

Ā 

D98% (Gy)

55.69ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.06

55.70ā€‰Ā±ā€‰1.08

āˆ’0.01ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.35

0.990

Ā 

HI

0.30ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.03

0.29ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.03

0.01ā€‰Ā±ā€‰0.01

0.002

  1. All data are presented as meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰SD of 40 patients. HI, homogeneity index; D2%, dose received by 2% of the volume; D50%, dose received by 50% of the volume; D95%, dose received by 95% of the volume; D98%, dose received by 98% of the volume. Other abbreviations as in TablesĀ 3 and 4.