Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for overall survival in patients with TSCC

From: Metabolic syndrome is associated with better prognosis in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma

Variable

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

Sexa

0.591 (0.356ā€“0.984)

0.043

0.681 (0.398ā€“1.166)

0.162

Age (years)

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒ<52

Ref

Ā 

Ref

Ā 

ā€ƒā‰„52

1.823 (1.100ā€“3.020)

0.020

2.149 (1.279ā€“3.614)

0.004

Tumor locationb

1.032 (0.607ā€“1.754)

0.908

Ā Ā 

Pathologic grade

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒWell differentiated

Ref

Ā 

Ref

Ā 

ā€ƒModerately differentiated

2.483 (1.475ā€“4.183)

0.001

2.417 (1.417ā€“4.124)

0.001

ā€ƒPoorly differentiated

4.728 (2.101ā€“10.639)

<0.001

2.726 (1.172ā€“6.336)

0.020

T category

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒT1/T2

Ref

Ā 

Ref

Ā 

ā€ƒT3/T4

3.575 (2.054ā€“6.223)

<0.001

2.007 (1.091ā€“3.691)

0.025

N category

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒN0

Ref

Ā 

Ref

Ā 

ā€ƒN+

4.846 (2.725ā€“8.618)

<0.001

3.408 (1.873ā€“6.202)

<0.001

Treatment c

3.963 (2.451ā€“6.407)

<0.001

2.559 (1.492ā€“4.392)

0.001

MS

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒWith MS

Ref

Ā 

Ref

Ā 

ā€ƒWithout MS

2.342 (1.070ā€“5.125)

0.033

2.518 (1.126ā€“5.631)

0.024

One component meets the criteria of MS

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒBMI

0.692 (0.330ā€“1.448)

0.328

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒGLU

0.938 (0.491ā€“1.792)

0.846

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒBP

0.745 (0.455ā€“1.221)

0.243

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒTG

0.695 (0.391ā€“1.235)

0.215

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒHDL

0.818 (0.491ā€“1.361)

0.439

Ā Ā 
  1. aMale versus female; bthe margo lateralis linguae versus other locations (the apex linguae, dorsum, and ventrum of the tongue); csurgery alone versus multimodality therapy. TSCC, tongue squamous cell carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference; MS, metabolic syndrome; BMI, body mass index; GLU, fasting plasma glucose; BP, blood pressure; TG, triglycerides; HDL, high-density lipoprotein.